Ok, is this a joke or satire? The picture looks normal. Eric has the same toothy grin with a little of his gums showing and Jr is smiling a little larger than the second pic but nothing unusual.

You just outed yourself as having not read the article. The point the writer makes is that this person is making policies that don’t preserve the lands it covers and make things worse for the animals AND the hunters (who he not once criticizes or in any way insults). The insult is putting in a game that says “I’m one…

Again, missing the point. The writer in no way minimizes, belittles or in any way demeans hunters. It’s written to point out that this hypocrite is making policy that is bad for conservation - including hunters. It’s stunning how dense so many ofbthese commenters are - then again it’s clear they didn’t read the…

Exactly. But the ones that got triggered and commented look for stories like this, don’t read the whole thing, then assume it’s something they disagree with and then feed off each other. Typical behaviour from this lot.

Oh give it a rest with your prepackaged annoyance at all the “anti-hunter” lib’rels. You’d have to be a lobotomized chimp to pretend this was anything but a big “fuck you” to people that don’t like Trump. It may come as a shock to you simple-minded twits but a helluva a lot of liberals are both gun owners and…

The irony is apparently over your head. “Conservative” as in “conserve” being celebrated with a game about killing things. Or did you think conserving land only involved the plants?

Ah yes, the “what would a dick do?” Is usually closely associated with what would an insecure man do. Answer of course is to be a dick.

“suspicion about the humans continues to *mount*”

I’m a real world fan and I’m not watching this for practical reasons not your simplistic “hot take” reasons. Trek has been poorly served by it’s network and that’s not a controversial view as it’s demonstrably true.

Going to the mirror universe you say?

Amen to that. Standing on principle and fighting for an ideal are exactly where big decisions should start but they’re called “ideals” for a reason: they’re not reality. Too many young voters still think in absolutes and that’s not the world we live in. It’s just not. You rarely ever have binary choices of good…

And we damn sure will. I think they’re trying to re-engineer Apartheid but from the other end. They both end up with majority whites in charge of government over a mixed race or non-white majority.

You’re trying to spin it with your phony outrage but you’re distorting the facts. The Democratic party knows that trying to make the electorate go to your party is standard practice for any party. There’s never been anything unnatural about that. What they object to is doing it in illegal and underhanded ways and…

It’s “Democratic” party.

Every politician of every party ALWAYS has the goal of expanding their party so why you’re pointing out an obvious fact of politics for hundreds of years is baffling. Unless of course this is another case of “if I do it it’s ok but if you do it it’s unethical/wrong/sleezy”, pick your adjective? It’s hypocritical and…

I get the intention to make this somewhat humorous but it fails as even mildly ironic. The very instinct that because “everyone” is doing something you should be suspicious is like the headline of everything wrong with society. When everyone tells you that touching a hot stove will burn you - you should fucking…

He wasn’t begging for rescue, he was trying to get proof to her and this was the only way.

I find that attitude adequate and in no way offensive.

“Police Commissioner to Baltimore Cops: Please Don’t Use Body Cams to Falsify Evidence”

I’m not sure it would make sense to use an experimental format to test the waters unless you intentionally wanted the results to lean toward a negative result. I’ve seen politicians do similar things when commissioning a “study”.