no-more-tears
no-more-tears
no-more-tears

I think it comes down to skin. You have really, really nice skin.

Why would I try to be polite about something so offensive as the original? Why wouldn't I replicate it exactly to show the other side just how awful it really is?

Okay, maybe it doesn't feel like it to you, but honestly, when I'm harassed, I want to fight back and fight back dirty. It isn't nice, but in the moment where, say, I drive up next to a guy who decides that it's a good time to show me a cell picture of his penis, what I want to do is cut the fucking thing off and

I used to work in an Abercrombie as a teenager (don't hate me I needed money) and some of the clothes felt more like toilet paper for dolls than something a human-sized human could wear. I remember a woman coming into the store to return a L polo shirt because her arms couldn't fit through the sleeves. Arms that NO

I am not bothered by your 10-year old comment because yes, in most stores, sizes run small. I have everything from an XS, S, M and L in my closet and I have a couple kids' shirts that actually, um, were designed for 1o-year-olds. I have to say that, in some circumstances, the comparison is apt. Most XS and S shirts

Truth be told, any woman would look amazing in a pencil skirt. I mean, c'mon, just look at how awesome they are:

That is very true. But you still get to decide how much you care. The more we play by the rules of patriarchy the less change we engender.

Yes, you can use make-up, clothing, hair, and posture to accentuate what genetics have given. But there are, indeed, people who have facial characteristics that can't be manipulated into conventional attractiveness no matter how many "tricks" are employed.

I hate this. I hate this so much. It isn't fair that "pretty" is something I should be able to do and I'm penalized if I can't or won't.

We don't. At least not in brick and mortar stores, all the shameful tents for us fatatrons are sold via internet.

I don't know, that bit about splitting a girls ass in two is pretty close to castration if you ask me.

Leaving assholes and dickheads aside (seriously, that store manager needs a kick in the ass really hard), I imagine that finding clothes for big women (and I don't mean just overweight) must be really hard.

Right, because asking a sales person for a size and finding out they don't carry it is the same as having someone make unsolicited comments about your weight and being asked to leave the store.

Listen to the lyrics closely and you'll see that they address that what they are saying is inappropriate and ask the male how they like being treated like a woman is treated. I have no problem with this, since it's really exactly the same thing as saying in your song that you're going to tear a woman's ass in two.

I beg to differ. I think that it's essential to the point. It's a parody, so it's essentially making fun of the extreme nature of the bigotry from men toward women. I don't think these women are actually advocating castration or emasculation, but in order to show the mirror image on the other side, this language is

I would say it's equal to this lyric in the original song: "I'll give you something big enough to tear your ass in two."

Did you miss the line: "I apologize if you think my lines are crass, tell me how it feels to be verbally harassed..."

I think it's just a clever rhyme. It doesn't bother me. Think about all the things male rappers/artists say in their songs, all to sound manly or tough. Flip those words around so they are threatening to men's sexuality, and suddenly everyone thinks they're taking it too far. That's the whole point of this video

I get what you're saying, but I'd tend to say that "castration" and "emasculation" tend to be flexible terms. Literally, the former indicates the removal of the testes, the latter indicates the removal of the penis. Figuratively, they're both freely used to indicate shaming a man for being a bad man, making him feel

Why can't he be mentally ill AND misogynist? The two are not mutually exclusive.