It reminds me heavily of the days when kids used to write into video game magazines asking for the magazine publishers to "make a new game" like what they described. Or this whole debacle:

That game didn't specifically say it was based on MCU stories, though.

Would *what* an hour and a half?

Lego Avengers seems to be a step backward, character-wise. If it's based on the MCU they can't use a bulk of the characters that were in LMSH, and LMSH had almost every character that could potentially be in this game anyway.

Lego already has the license. My only guess is Activision had/has the console game rights locked up.

I still can't figure out why we don't have a Lego TMNT yet....

Poor guy.

I would argue that Diamond and Jade were more infamous as well as well-known. I never saw them myself, sadly, but I heard they were showing up in Funcolands (or were they Gamestops) across the nation.

Mein gott, I've never seen that 2-in-1. I'd kill for that.

Blargh, I was hoping for Mae Whitman.

It seems a lot of Kotaku articles these days are "guy/gal nobody's ever heard of hates popular thing." So where's my article?

Not sure if disemvoweled or headsmash on keyboard....

Ya lost me after you pretended that Food Babe was a credible source.

I like these "Lore" videos as a nice thinkpiece on the stories behind games and their settings, but it's bothering me that I'm finding people taking every bit of the information in them as canon, and using the video as "proof".

Same with Mr. Juan de Rection of Poughkeepsie.

This is the first time I've seen the comic get any sort of negative lashing. Everywhere from MK to comic sites are giving it praise.

The thumbnail on that video made Hasha-tasha-whateverthefuck look like a giant mecha.

Dat Electivire AI

I learned "oblige" from Mr. X in Streets of Rage 1.