Robots can’t identify as a specific race.

Well their marketing department is probably full of autists from 4chan AO what do you expect ?

For a shit box, it held up pretty well.

Why was that never an option for the #dougcar

Again where is the corruption? She does seem to be an unethical person and that doesn’t her corrupt. What was her personal benefit from bypassing FOIA, besides showing her view that the law doesn’t apply to her (which is the opinion of rich and powerful people everywhere)? If she was using her position to exchange…

Do you have a any proof from legit sources that she is or are you assuming she is based on you’re definition of corruption? She does seem more prone to scandal, which is not corruption. You also seem to be forgetting how much influence Trump supporters have over the GOP, so any bipartisan support for impeachment and…

I didn’t say she shouldn’t accept responsibility for her subordinates actions. The right thing for her to do own up to it and learn from a what happened. Resigning isn’t an issue anymore because she isn’t Secretary of State.

That depends if it can be proven that she had knowledge of what was going on. It’s one thing to own up to your administration’s fuck ups, it’s another to be criminally liable. That’s how Reagan got off.

I’m making my decision based on the facts as they are, facts are black and white. They can be seen as good or bad based on our opinions, yet the facts are what they are. I will concede that it is a lot harder to get legit facts because of the news media’s failure to present them in an unbiased way.

It’s short sightsighted because they’re elected for four years. Short and long term Clinton is still more qualified not to fuck things up. If we don’t like her she’s out in 2020, any long term legislation she signs still has less of a chance to dramatically alter the country.

I disagree, if you take the facts about Clinton and Trump, Clinton comes out the more qualified candidate. Any reasonable person would come to that conclusion.

All of you’re beliefs still doesn’t make them anything more than opinion. Until you have facts that back up your opinions, you’re arguments are as invalid as anyone else spouting nonsense.

Ah, so your top three are:

You seem to have really bad reading comprehension or don’t want to admit Facebook is not important to history. Facebook is not a diary because diaries are not meant to be read by anyone (except the writer), which is why people record what they really think and feel. Facebook does not allow that because we practice…

Links to things that weren’t posted on Facebook. If something is news worthy and historically significant, it will be archived. I didn’t say the pics and videos on Facebook aren’t real, it is that people tend to post mainly the positive aspects of their lives on FB because they know it’s gonna be seen by the public.…

Facebook doesn’t reflect your actual reality, so it holds no historical significance. What you’re talking about is a diary, Facebook is not a diary

Don’t be so triggered bro.

I think America really needs a word war to get people heads out of their asses. Seriously if you think this is racist, then you’re racist.

If they had kept small car production in the US they would have created jobs with the Ranger and ecosport move.

So what you're saying that the California drought is because of bad water management. That's not how droughts work, they are the result of years of insufficient precipitation.