Yep. That’s their logic.

I bet they won’t. After all, there’s also the belief that attempted suicide is a plea for attention among that kind of person.

It creates part of the problem that a lot of women are valued entirely for their looks and for no other reason.

Fine.

I vote Fitz dies. Save us the time of seeing a trial.

She was also linked to the magazine’s increasing unpopularity with her new direction.

How much you want to bet there will be attempts to ban cheese under the logic of “drugs bad” and wanting to protect the children?

People will be offended over anything. Including assholes deciding to keep their mouths shut while still not backing down on being assholes, as I’ve seen in another article on here.

She makes it a point to try not to directly say the director is wrong on that because she knows it was her choice.

These costumes don’t even rate the top 50 sexy costumes I’ve seen. Neither in sexiness nor in “Oh Dear God Why” rating.

And then you would be siding with a convicted rapist.

I’m seeing them less and less, strangely enough. I guess they’re becoming rarer?

Here’s another problem with changing to a different last name the article fails to address: It can make genealogy searches massively more difficult, and actually increase the chances of accidental incest.

The part that makes me facepalm the hardest is that the parents are onboard with this.

My pleasant thoughts are, “Yay! He’s not making things worse by getting involved!”

Sometimes, that’s all we can ask. That someone simply declines to get involved. Given this guy’s history, do you honestly want him involved?

You ow me a new pair of eyes. I clawed them out.

If I understood that, I’d be a multi-billionair psychologist with a Nobel Prize.

Of course he’s lying. He’s a douche :P

And yet, he makes it a point to state he’s not getting involved in this issue.