neptune432
neptune432
neptune432

Now THAT’S how you make football interesting!

Pfft, they assume I need a game to do that.

You mean the art styles? ‘Cause that seems more like a matter of opinion.

Brian Vaughan’s writing is scary-good.

I’m always concerned about making characters sound different. It is really not easy sometimes.

It’s great in terms of looking realistic, but beyond that, it’s not that interesting. Besides, The Witcher 3 looks better, realistically-speaking.

If that’s not it, then what makes them fugly? None of them look bad, they just don’t have big budgets.

Nah, it’s readable. You just gotta click on it to zoom-in.

What do you mean? None of them are poorly-animated.

The Simpsons Movie

I thought violence would be the answer.

Dunno. The show was cancelled before it was finished. They did make a comic book series that concludes the show, but I haven’t read all the issues yet.

They did finish the series though, through 20 issues worth of comics. It came out pretty recently.

That’s a truly amazing, dare I say it, beautiful thing. Having the game you’ve always wanted come to life is just the best thing.

Yeah, OK, I see what you mean.

Am I the only one that feels like the article could’ve explained the show a little better? It’s not bad, but something about the writing throws me off.

Both are equally good, but for different reasons. AT is more of the “philosophical” show, while SU focuses on what it means to be a person.

I don’t really think this show has that issue. If it’s being wacky, then it’s probably just for the sake of it.

To be fair though, it’s realistic for a kid to act that way.

I don’t think they’re trying to make it exclusively for adults. It’s more like the show is appropriate for kids, but is still serious, like many other cartoons from the before-time.