Better movement, inventory, and horses?

Sometimes you don’t get the answers you want. That’s true for life at least, and I’d like to see that reflected in more games as well.

Oh yeah, they’re awesome. But once we get to the point where graphics are super-realistic, what then? Will more games get beter art direction than “realistic?” I’d like that really. Also, once people get over how good the graphics look (I kinda have already), there’s no way games can use good graphics alone to make up…

Eh, that’s Cyberpunk. Close, but not the same thing.

That’s different. Because the thing is, the work that this guy has done is actually good, considering what the person had to work with. People are saying that it’s bad without knowing what they’re talking about.

“Hey buddy, bet you can’t guess if my horns are real or not!”

Dirty sci-fi world? Wow, I was asking for a game like that in the last art-related article!

Sombrero Ninja?

Wowzers. Aztecs got with the time!

“’Go camping,’ they said. ‘It’ll be fun,’ they said!”

Can we focus more on the game-part of the game now?

Hell it even happened to MGS 5.

“Dammit, when did my own sidekick get cooler than me? Ah well, if you can’t beat ‘em...”

It did. It’s not the first apocalyptic work, but it is the first post-apocalyptic anything. It’s like how Neuromancer essentially created the Cyberpunk genre as we know it (previous Cyberpunk works existed before it, but they were less defined, and were more about sci-fi).

I like the idea, but I’d like it more playing it on my console. I mean, PC is less expensive, but I would like to play it on my console in the future.

One franchise invented the post-apocalypse genre, the other is an incredibly popular manga series. Neither are shitty.

Sure, but there’s nothing like that in the game, and honestly, it doesn’t matter in the end.

Well, yeah, most people realize that technically, this is animal cruelty. But no one really cares.

Why?

It’s not really crazy. Just need to be used to it.