Or we can accept what the rest of the world does about appropriation: Not giving a shit as long as we’re not being disrespectful about it.

“Why must our culture regard upright urination as the most essential component of masculinity?”

Of course it is. But that goes both ways. If I was with a guy this had happened to, while I would very much appreciate the fact that he was willing to still care about my pleasure, I’d feel pretty terrible that all our sex was one-sided and I would much prefer if he could get something out of it too. So I’m not sure…

I think you’ve gone looking for issues where they don’t really exist here.

but how much does she have to do with production? and they did say the workers were making twice the minimum wage...so like...??

That’s what I love. “Ivy Park/LLL/UA/whatever is crap! I only buy the finest sweatshop produced yoga pants at Old Navy!”

Yes, AND consumers also need to be willing to pay more for goods if they want people to earn a fair wage. You can’t complain about these companies’ practices and then go buy an Old Navy shirt for $3.

Sitting is not splatter-proof. Ask a tired drunk.

I wasn’t a fan of the way people were judging her, but being able to enjoy sex and being able to get pregnant are like miles apart.

What the fuck are you talking about?

On the other hand: Strap ons.

I feel you. I was for Obama in 08 and felt like HRC supporters didn’t appreciate as a woman I wasn’t all rah rah for her. Now this time around, I like Bernie, but am leaning more for Hillary (her time as Sec. of State made me see her in a new light) but I HATE this sexism from both candidates followers. I really,…

Pretty horrible, but sums up what many Hilary supporters believe. Somehow because I’m a woman I should be voting for Hilary because she’s one as well. Or I’m sexist because I don’t vote for Hilary. Everyone wants to talk about BernieBros, but Clinton supporters are just as bad (if not worse) when it comes to these…

I’m not being sarcastic or making a crack. What I’m saying is I don’t understand what your point is about her number of twitter followers. It’s irrelevant. It lends her no credence whatsoever.

I think I made it clear that this is the source of my cognitive dissonance. I want to believe Juanita Broddrick, but I actually just don’t. But I do believe the Cosby accusers. Part of that is that there is only one person accusing Clinton, and many accusing Cosby, and Broaddrick waited 21 years, and it seems super…

I wish it were irrelevant, but it’s not. Bill Clinton has been the target of right-wing attacks since he was governor of Arkansas. Anyone aligned with groups targeting him should be viewed with heightened scrutiny.

Broaddrick’s civil case was dismissed, though? So is that enough? She didn’t report anything for over 20 years, and the whole thing was weird and seemed politically motivated, but again, I can’t actually just discredit her on that basis because that seems unfair. She deserves to speak out as much as she wants. But…

I agree, but in this case there was no way for the legal system to respond promptly as the woman didn’t come forward for 21 years and when she did it was amid a ton of political shenanigans which she seems like she might be part of. Now another 16 years later she’s coming forward again and it, again, seems like it…

The number of followers on social media directly correlates with credibility, dontcha know? ;)

What does her twitter follower count have to do with anything, let alone her credibility?