necrotica
Steve
necrotica
Now playing

I fully support getting rid of the Time Warp.

How is creationism a pseudo-science? It doesn't claim to be science (unlike, say ID), it's just "not science".

I think the free market will solve this.

Solar power is a viable source, if you can find a way to resolve the following major problems:

I honestly dont know, but im speculating pipelines installation and upkeep is less expensive than buying and maintaining solar panel arrays,

So assuming liberalism continues to kill the economy (1 & 2) and solar power doesn't suffer from the NIMBY problem wind has had (3), we should build lots of small solar power plants (4 is just a progression of 1-3). This is what happens when lawyers decide energy policy.

Dvorsky, trolling yet again.

I guess the records of China, and Japan don't count or tree ring data does not count either.

lets see grapes growing in areas of Europe that would not see grapes again until the 19th century, Rice cultivations expanded in asia and I guess your right not anoff data form the world.

Amazingly, you are also wrong on history. Look up the Younger Dryas, grasshopper. Climate can change in an awful hurry.

Life is insanely easy now though. People like to bitch about specifics, but lets face it, the majority of the developed world live a cushy life. We've nearly removed the whole 'survival' aspect of being alive.

I have educated myself.

And what was the CO2 level?

Your comment makes little sense. The warming was global during the times of the Greeks and the Romans. Don't be an ass if you don't even know what is being talked about.

Ah...global warming...possibly the greatest whammy ever perpetuated...

Average temperature for 10,000 years? Wow, Jones, you might want to look up how hot it was for the Greeks and Romans.

I guess you preferred the rich black man's opinion?

No. GMO bans aren't anti-science; they're anti-corporate. There's a world of difference.

Anti-GMO is NOT anti-science. GMO "food" is soaking in RoundUp.