necgray
necgray
necgray

I have pretty mixed feelings about the generally positive upswing in representation for and acknowledgement of neurodivergence. Like I think it’s an overall boon that people are more open and accepting but I also feel like an *awful lot* of people are attributing to neurodivergence what sounds, to me, like social

Your hands must be sticky and red from all the cherry picking.

You’re right, I got the timing wrong.

But is he actually perceptive? Or did he come to some correct conclusions by accident?

Yeah, people are all saying “he’s right!”. Well sure, but for the wrong reasons. And in the most narrow way, which is typical for him.

Because it’s 100% pure uncut Jerry Seinfeld, a man who has been utterly incapable of considering a perspective outside of his own narrow-ass view for his entire professional career.

A little of both. And to be clear, the premise of 90s is that the season takes place over summer break rather than the whole year. So Eric & Donna’s kid doesn’t live with Kitty and Red full time, she’s just visiting over the summer. A problem I have with the premise generally because part of That 70s charm was the

That happened well before 90s Show. It DOESN’T have anything to do with this. Hate Kunis for the letter all you want, it’s irrelevant to the actual article.

Eric is obsessed with Star Wars, which released in 77. And that was like first season.

This is slippery slope nonsense.

I would agree that the shift in focus after Character was to the good but the shift from procedural to serial is not and has never been a relevant indicator of quality. I know you didn’t say that outright but it’s implied. And I deeply dislike that fairly common misconception.

There is no living creature on the planet that I want to spend 24 hours a day 7 days a week with. Ease up a bit on these parents.

And he’s wrong because it’s not interceding for someone’s sensitivity, it’s interceding for someone whose voice is not as amplified. Generally because of demographics. But hell, he and Clapton probably have some “fun” thoughts about the demos of the UK these days...

Okay. But where was the harm? Ultimately what does it matter that someone with good, if silly, intentions made an honest mistake out of a surfeit of goodwill? Given how careless and shitty the human race can be with each other I would vastly prefer that people overcorrect than not. And people like Cleese who hold

Ehhhh.... I throw f bombs as much for color as genuine expression. I did mean it about your “more harm than good” but it wasn’t anger as much as annoyed confusion. Cuz I genuinely don’t know what harm you mean. If you mean it the same way the lawsuit meant it then that’s about money and I don’t care at all about money

Personally I'm not into their "parody" of reality and cable access TV. They do a fake version of a real thing that is more interesting and funny for being the genuine article.

Coincidentally I just did over the weekend!

Nothing hurts worse than a scrape.

You don’t think it’s “remotely” enforceable? What about the release window between theatrical and home video? That was put into place and enforced. That window narrowed, of course, and now for some movies it’s in theaters and streaming same day. But for a very long time that wasn’t the case. And it was because there

And yet for the entire existence of the home video market they were able to create and enforce a release window between theatrical and home video. EGAD, IMPOSSIBLE!