ncc1701a
ncc1701a
ncc1701a

I’m talking about the rich pricks that do nothing but suck money up without actually creating anything in its place. The Wall Street fund managers and vulture capitalists that buy up business after business, suck what life they can out of it and then dismantle it for parts all the while making sure their pockets get

Oklahoma has some truly spectacular and majestic plains, especially at sunrise and sunset, but it also has Oklahomans.

Alaska is where I grew up and I can say with all knowledge....yep.

The middle class is not who is being taxed in this scenario. Although I did accidentally drop a word out of one line of my comment, so that may not be clear outside of context clues.

He has the same approval rating now as his share of the 2016 popular vote.  Democrats once again have no idea what they are doing and are going to walk right over the same cliff.

Nobody is turbo-fucking the middle class. That has already happened. we are trying to fix the mess by turbo-fucking (ie: advocating tax increases that would provide the funds to make sweeping improvements in the lives of the 99% and the uber-wealthy that got us to this point won’t even notice.) But please, continue

Lasted longer than some. Satirical magazines seem to shine brief but bright in this country. RIP Mad, Spy, National Lampoon, et al.  

2 whole tanks.  This is perfectly Trump-grotesquely authoritarian in conception and pathetically rinky-dink in execution.

I’m not saying Biden White House wouldn’t be better than a Trump White House. I’m saying that a Biden White House would be at best a blip, a pause maybe, in the end stages of the long slow hollowing out that has been ongoing in this country since 1980. This has reached it’s nadir with Trump-the point where the rot has

You’re going to argue with a straight face that if Biden were to win the primary and beat Trump it won’t fix anything? You understand that by making that argument you are say that Joe Biden, with all of his faults (and he has them) that he is no different that Donald Trump?

Ah, the old I’m going to make the same arguments over and over again and when people get tired of posting the same rebuttals over again and stop-I’ll declare victory. (Love the assumption I couldn’t bring myself to vote for Clinton. Quite a Bernie Bro strawman you’ve set yourself up with here.)

Pro-tip: Starting a comment with the words “Pro-tip” is an excellent way to ensure no one ever reads the rest.

They can't steal it if it's not close.

All Obama had to do was start slow-rolling federal funds dispersal to red states and Mitch would have caved. But that’s what you get when you send an accommodater to do a knife-fighter’s job.

Arguing that HRC’s failure to get out the votes of the people it needed to is somehow not the campaign’s fault but the voter’s is leaving in place the same thinking that is going to insure this whole shit show repeats itself.

Remember all those stories about how Clinton had this so in the bag that she is considering making a play for the purpler red states? If you nominate a candidate who has the highest negatives of anyone who could have been nominated, you had best not run a campaign whose subtext is “we know you might be holding your

That happened because McConell is a fighter who understood the situation. Obama isn’t and did not. To paraphrase Spaceballs: “Evil will always triumph over Good, because Good is dumb.”

She could have done what Obama should have done. Turn the federal spigot off. The President has a lot of power in deciding how and when federal money gets spent by creating the rules that oversee the distribution of that money. You call Mitch into the oval office to watch you sign the executive order that puts 14 more

It doesn’t, but the generally low level of the average person’s intelligence and engagement isn’t new information. The point of a campaign is to get your people to the polls. One campaign did, the other didn’t. I get the feeling the campaign that failed in this respect had actually forgotten that was the goal.

One of the cases the SC punted on here was the blatant gerrymandering of Maryland by the Democrats for the stated goal of removing a Republican representative from power.