You really can’t actually read or understand basic English ? That is so sad, but you are a brave guy to be carrying on with your obvious deficits. Do they let you eat with real silverware too or are you not quite past the “might stab himself in the face" stage?
ncc1701a
ncc1701a
I shouldn’t have used a word that has as its definition
Pardon my quoting myself, but you seem to be having some comprehension trouble.
John Roberts can’t be fired by the President. His nomination was a political act, his continuing in the position is not. The Director of the CIA can be fired at anytime by an incoming President. If Bush was so unhappy with him, he could have been cleaning out his office by the end of the day January 20, 2001.
And the political leadership of an administration doesn’t end with the Cabinet. It’s every head of an organization appointed by the head of the government. I am not surprised you didn’t get the distinction.
So you think he wasn’t a political appointee because Clinton wasn’t a politician?
The director of the CIA is a political appointee who serve at the pleasure of the President.
Yes, exactly what I’m saying.
The name was Chalabi. And he wasn’t an intelligence asset, he was a lobbyist who lived in D.C. and told the Bushies what they wanted to hear.
The US intelligence community didn’t fail us in Iraq II or pre-9/11. What the intelligence community knew was reported to the political leadership and then the political leadership told us what they wanted to. (The Bush administration knew the CIA was at best uncertain on whether the Nigerian Yellowcake story was…
You have missed my point. I imagine that happens fairly often with you.
That’s quite an unhinged diatribe. Yeah, you definitely seem like the one of the two of us with the coherent, clear-eyed view of the situation. (And I don’t know if Bernie would have won, but I’m reasonably certain he would have mounted a campaign in Wisconsin. It apparently slipped the mind of THE MOST QUALIFIED…
How about what Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez suggests:
And given the way he votes, that seat might as well be Republican anyway.
Says the guy riding so hard for a party that nominated a Presidential
candidate with the highest net negatives of any candidate in history, and instead of mounting an actual campaign in the traditionally bulwark Democratic midwest, made a play for TEXAS. The party ran a candidate that most of the electorate would…
So your argument is that the Republicans and their agenda is indeed what the country wants. Alrighty then, it’s what the country gets.
And what has a similar tactic gotten the Right? Except for the Presidency, both houses of Congress, the Supreme Court, the majority of Governorships, and full or partial control of most of 36 state legislatures, they have been absolutely destroyed in the last ten years.
No, it was Hilary Clinton’s historically dumb and incompetent campaign that brought us where we are. You Clintonite dead-enders just can’t bring themselves to admit that their Queen and Champion torpedoed herself and that is taking all of us down. It always has to be the Russians, the Republicans, or those damn kids…
The Clinton campaign put the story out there that she had it so in the bag that she could ignore the midwestern traditional Democratic firewall states in favor of toying with turning Texas blue.