natrat
natrat
natrat

looks like designed by 9 year old child, production version should look way better when toned down

that’s a lean pop

yes taking that into account “normies” need to be comitted to the ferrari possibly at the expense of other hobbies. No way i could stomach the 6k clutch and would look at a porsche but that’s not as exotic so spend the money skiing vail and aspen

I had a 690 enduro for a while and tuning the motor, more fuel, timing and air flow, made it really smooth. But it sucked on the freeway anyway. So twitchy ,only tolerable at 70 mph for half an hour or 45 minutes at a time, but that’s not its design brief, really nice all rounder. 800 version would be sweet but

crackpipe-94k miles means chances are the motor will have to be freshened sooner rather than later to get original performance levels-w/50k miles i would 14k with 100k miles 9k

yes but in the world of suspect auto reviews VAG can do no wrong, it is absurd like in this case not one single criticism. I’m sure this is a nice car but at over 4k lbs there is no way it can compete dynamically with an A45 or similar beemer, and then compare at that 80k price range and it’s an even tougher sell

i dunno the 950 se has a different tank than the adv, it doesnt hold fuel low . I think the ideal is to centralize mass

i think the beemer(s) are just as easy to strand you as the katooms plus the orange bikes crash well. I rode a 950 superenduro for a while and it was the only big bike i could ride in the sand with its enduro geometry and lighter weight, but still it was a top heavy pig. A regular 950/990/1190 forget it and the big

more advanced tcs abs and in the duc skyhook susp-1/3 more power self explanatory

both have a more advanced electronics pack for whatever that’s worth similar to a third more fwiw

92 HP
70 ft lbs. tourque
18.1L tank (4.96 US Gallons, 4.1 UK Gallons)

Manual Transmission
Dry weight: 206kg/454 lbs
Wet weight: 228kg/502 lbs

Manual Transmission with ABS
Dry weight: 212kg/467 lbs
Wet weight: 232kg/511 lbs

DCT Transmission
Dry weight: 222kg/489 lbs
Wet weight: 242kg/533 lbs

it’s a nice looking bike and inexpensive but a p twin is shit compared with the desmo v twin

i’m like omg what a stupid cuv you can’t take skiing more than x miles from youre house-toyota or bmw should make a hybrid cuv with ludicrous mode for 60 or 70k or whatever this costs

mv turismo veloce 800, i have a cagiva gran canyon 900 now and i like how compact it is for this kind of bike while still upright and spacious and the MV looks like a modern version of this aside from the sweet aircooled desmo vs the triple

holy shit his pupils are tiny

the 911 gt3 ripping up that was way cooler, not want

i used to ride my 950 near willets etc and it ocurred to me that not going fast wasn’t really the sign of suckitude , no what really says you suck is not paying attention for just a second and getting crossed up with tank slapper on one of those dusty forgotten fire roads and launching over the side and it would be

yea that was my first reaction re the styling; at least from that front/side view in the picture above it’s got that ugly chrysler rear quarter, a coupe would be mean looking

That’s awesome!

sadly the rs3 and the newest one does not handle well, that’s cool part about the mercs they have better balance at the limit not horrible understeer