Shouldn’t he have gotten a penalty for holding the puck in that area behind the net? I could google the rule and see if there’s a exception here, but I’d be missing out on kinja-wrath if I’m wrong.
Shouldn’t he have gotten a penalty for holding the puck in that area behind the net? I could google the rule and see if there’s a exception here, but I’d be missing out on kinja-wrath if I’m wrong.
I guess the Nazis invented propoganda news. You guys ran with it during McCarthy’s era.
I can’t even find a a typo to correct. Agree on all points.
Didn’t FOX declare GWB the winner in his first term?
Agreed. But lets not compare journalism bias to overt manipulation of the viewership by corporate interests.
Can’t disagree with your list and your reason for your skepticism. But I struggle to compare a Bill Oreilly “fair and unbiased” segment with anything from other national news sources.
Fair. In Canada our CBC news which is also state-sponsored and is by no means perfectly unbiased. Keeping them honest is always a healthy exercise and I’m happy to agree they are not perfect. But US networks.. wow. I mean it’s obvious to anyone not in the US, but Americans I get the sense have no idea how terrible…
No, I mean one isn’t perfect while the other is a trainwreck.
BBC is to Clinton as US news is to Trump.
Maybe your country just doesn’t understand journalism. Your news outlets have political views! Have you guys ever watched the BBC? News is for NEWS! Facts! Not opinions.. Cut the panels crap, just read the stories. Fox started your descent, and you guys just accepted it and started copying it in every form of…
Yes he’s rational. You can apply two decades of game theory to his regimes. One of IRs most rational actors.
Freewill is a state of cognition, not a belief structure.
You rank the value of people based on your beliefs?
Sounds like you’re cool dooring people and declaring “not my fault!”. Cause you know, fucking vegans.
Lol you don’t belong on the road if you don’t check before opening your car door. If a car takes your door off, you’re gonna blame someone else too?
No, nationalism is not exclusive to nation-states. Trans-national or sub-national (Oregon Militia), identity politics are aggressive and outwardly destructive in nature. Franz Ferdinand, the Third Reich, the Crusades, Championship riots, Hutus and Tutsis... just stop with your “we’re the best and you better be with us…
Nationalism as a destructive force is hardly a new concept, just one ignored by Americans. Islamism is nationalism; a sense of belonging to a group where the group does not recognize the current territoriality of nation-states. Islamists and American nationalists are equally motivated by a belief of exceptionalism.
Sorry, I don’t understand your reply. Sounds like you disagree with me but can’t put into words why.
Nationalism is the most destructive human force of the last 300 years. Problems besetting our world are a symptom of nationalism.