I don't mean to be difficult, but do you have a source I could look at?

I'm sure, regardless of optimizations, the ESRAM won't be nearly as much of a problem as Cell though. Hopefully some basic optimizations will do the trick.

I think what he's more referring to is that instead of shitty handheld ports of PS4 / XO games (since you can just use the Remote Play option), there will be more straight Vita exclusives.

But I could be wrong. That's just my interpretation.

Let me play devil's advocate here:

PS3 introduced the Cell architecture to what? Complaints and years of optimization that ultimately led 3rd party titles to performing weaker on the PS3 vs. the 360 (look at games by Bethesda and Rockstar for examples). Sony learns from this and utilizes x86 architecture and GDDR5…

I played the beta version on Xbox and it was pretty buggy itself (random crashes, glitches, animation loops, etc).

I can't speak for the PC version though.

Does anyone even remember a flawless online game launch? I just don't understand why anyone is surprised anymore.

I think that might have something to do with the millions of people playing the game online at the same time. Or it might also have something to do with the fact that pre-internet games had less than a gigabyte of HDD space required and generally a few megabytes of RAM required.

You're comparing apples to spaghetti.…

Isn't this practically confirmed? Ever since Ruby and Sapphire, they alternate between a new region and a return to an old region.

Hoenn ——-> Kanto
Sinnoh ——-> Johto

Then Unova had an actual numbered sequel, so they didn't really do it there... but that game also broke the rule of there being a third game (Yellow,…

Yeah, except it's the truth. I'm not saying that it's right or that it should be done, because it shouldn't.

But you can't just ignore it and pretend that it'll just go away. Stupid people run the world and the media, and Sony has to work within that restriction.

Smart move on Ubisoft's part for three reasons:

1) It doesn't compete with AC4, which is a game they have been heavily marketing. Both being similar genres and coming out within two weeks of each other was questionable from the get-go.

2) AC3 is a prime example of trying to get things done within a certain timeframe…

What the hell else excuse would there be? They said the earliest year it will come out is 2015. And this is from the same people who debuted FFXIII Versus in 2006 and we STILL haven't gotten that.

This game is in the positively earliest stages it can be in and actually still show graphics. And you're complaining…

I don't think you know what irony means.

I feel like you don't understand how business works.

If they allow those things to happen, even if they don't condone them, they're liable for tons of bad press because they allow people to do those things in the first place.

For example, in a situation where a kid decides to rape his little sister and shoot his parents…

Yeah, but at least they were productive in their weirdness. Not commenting on websites replacing "nobody" with "nopony".

There's a little bit of a difference there.

Burnout 3 was the pinnacle of the series. I actually just bought a copy for PS2 a couple weeks ago and, let me tell you, it holds up!

Totally hit the nail on the head here. Production was about $115 million, whereas marketing was $150 million.

http://www.3news.co.nz/Grand-Theft-Au…

Even so, that's an insane pull. What that translates to is about 13-14 million units in one day. GTA IV made that in the whole year it was out.

I hate it when people assume that just because kids curse they're going to turn into little angry shits that destroy life as we know it.

Chill out man, I cursed a lot as a kid. Not in front of my parents mind you, but around my friends. It's what the 'cool' adults do in action movies. And I promise I didn't drop out of…

I'd respect having a different opinion, but you're telling someone -who isn't you and who hasn't gone through the same experiences as you- to act like you. If anything, you're not letting her have an opinion because you think she needs to "grow up".

She's a younger girl, who is being labeled online (and in real life by…

"—in fact, Taylor Swift (or her people, at least) actually caught wind of Emily's Pinterest board, resulting in lawyers demanding that Pinterest not only get rid of the quotes, but also asked that Emily be suspended from the service—and if they didn't, Swift would seek damages."

Uh, when you have a millionaire…

Wow, a lot of hate for someone who literally does not impact any of us in the slightest.

Who cares if he waits in line for a phone that you don't think is worth the wait? It's something that is clearly important to him and that's all that should matter to any of us.

I'm not saying that some of the things he said weren't wrong. Using the term "erotic" was a mistake.

But blasting the dude for making a mistake in a series where you can literally press R1 to stare at breasts seems a bit... odd. I mean, we're talking about the guy who asked you to stare at Meryl's ass and Eva's boobs.

Li…