Sure that’s a conversation they’d have to have at some point, but the first thing they provide to her of the character spanning a season of a show is... the underage sex scene.

“Again, still being 17, the first scene that I read from the show was my sex scene and my intimacy scenes, that includes the scene where I’m bathing the king—anything that felt intimate was considered an intimacy scene, which I thought was great.”

Not to be a prude, but “HotD???” Really?

Encouraging the financially ignorant and disadvantaged to invest in crypto-currency is just another way for shady, morally challenged rich guys to transfer poor people’s money into their own pockets. A move like giving away some negligible amount of product to a number of different people would be commonly known as…

Cryptocurrency is still too volatile to keep pushing as an alternative to actual cash. This is nonsense.

Bitcon?

“Just imagine! Instead of OUR coins being stolen, we can use you as a levy and hackers can steal all of you poors’ bitcoins! Your combined pittance would add up to our millions, so the thief can steal your shit rather than ours! It’s like a lotto with your economic future. It’s your opportunity to raise yourself out…

Jesus. That’s an entirely different story. What the fuck is wrong with the writers at Jez? That’s beyond a hot take, that’s deforming something entirely, Daily Mail style... 

The headline conveniently leaves out the fact that she had been a pro-choice activist for around eight years prior to this, and certainly prior to Roe V Wade. She changed her mind when she was 21, and prior to that she’d been facing years of indoctrination (and likely lies about the danger pregnancy actually entails).…

It’s almost as though there’s a whole group of people who actively work to keep young women misinformed about their own bodies and basic biology, huh?

Maybe if they weren’t so busy trying to thwart “us,” they’d have some bandwidth for basic kindness and fellowship.

She just didn't care until it affected her. There's a whole political party for that.

Fair. I think my opinion has little to do with this woman in particular and more to do with my general distrust of “Christians” who need a personal experience to find empathy. I’m pretty bad at giving them the benefit of the doubt about...well, anything, really.

Maybe. But I think she represents that ugly contingent of people who are quite happy for things to be criminalized for other people so long as they can buy their way out of the law. I have a feeling if she’d had the money to buy a safe, illegal abortion in Texas, hell, she would have done that instead of driving ten…

My initial reaction isn’t a nice one. This basic bitch should have known all this before it happened to her. It shouldn’t be necessary for it to happen to her. On the other hand, maybe this basic bitch going on TV is exactly what’s needed to change the minds of people like her?

“How could you be so cruel as to pass a law that you know will hurt women and that you know will cause babies to be born in pain?” she said. “How is that humane? How is that saving anybody?”

People think of these wars and colonial violence as some way off past thing and not something people are still dealing with and something that people who are still alive very much remember. And the ‘Well the Queen didn’t have much control over it” takes are just.... the word “control” is doing a lot of work there....…

You missed the long period of the child being under the treatment of a therapist before any medications are ever considered. This is done because they want to make sure it isn’t a phase. And that doesn’t include visits to a pediatrician and endocrinologist that each have to sign off on any treatment plan. If you don’t…

Sounds like a definite thing that has really, really happened for real, you guys!

The woman lost multiple family members in the British-backed Nigerian genocide and had to flee the country with her parents as a child. This is less “Look at me” and much more “Look at what Elizabeth Windsor’s reign is responsible for.”