Mexico being right next to US is somewhat weighting the question but English people spend a lot on US goods and services and pop culture and visit the US as high spending tourists a lot. If they have more money they will spend a lot of back in the US.

Of when economic leakage is harmful and not part the general input/output flow.

From one developed nation to another. Only instances I’ve seen where leakage is damaging to an economy rather than as part of the general input/output is e.g a company in a developed nation opening a sweatshop in a 3rd world country where it extracts more money than it injects.

Incorrect again. I asked you to provide and example of leakage being used in the context you brought it up in and said I’d concede. You avoided doing that.

As I was the one who gave a pretty standard textbook example and you didn’t I’d say you work out if I do or don’t but at this point I’m not sure if you could.

As I’ve never said the circular theory is wrong you’re correct that I don’t have to prove a counter theory is true. Well done.

Then you’ll be able to provide an example of it being used in that context if it was valid for that context. Surely someone with your knowledge of economics could do that. I guess you could keep avoiding doing that indefinitely though for some reason.

You’ll be able to prove that then instead of relying on the rigid application of a single theory onto the real world.

You were sloppy with your wording then. No worries it happens to us all sometimes. Presumably you could easily find an example of leakage being used in a academic paper or journal in the context of two developed nations rather than something like the example I gave above. I wonder if you'll be able to.

Yeah you aren’t psychic nor can you read context.

“Yes, leakages from the economy are a thing. It’s called the circular flow of income”

You’re not psychic so don’t have a clue what I thought. And anyway I’ve already purchased both. Your first two criticisms were that this is US based site and that theres a pandemic and recessions in other places too. Theres nothing to ignore there.

Yeah you don't have any examples of the two terms being used interchangeably because they aren't yet you pretended they were for some reason. Real smooth.

No I literally had just taken a sleeping pill and was half asleep but if it makes you feel better to imagine you had a gotcha point go for it. Still doesn’t explain why the US company Microsoft is a bad choice or why someone who wasn’t going to spend any money but instead spends some money  is bad. You basically…

And furthermore The Problem With Popplers is problematic.

.

No it’s a discussion not a consumer review you literally just said that. And “leakages from the economy” isn’t a thing as you’ve ignored all the revenue made besides ignoring one of the consoless is made by a US company. Not forgetting the fact that if this gets people spending but other things don’t it doesn’t matter…

These products do inject money into the economy. Do you think when Sony release a movie the only people making money are the Sony HQ in Japan?

Theres so much more money than just the bit goes to Target. From adverts and marketing to accessories and everything else that comes with a new console launch. Hell even articles like this drive revenue. And that's ignoring Microsoft's console too. Sure at a household level there's an argument to be made for people…

Yes the only money made from the PS5 goes only to Sony in Japan. This is how economies work.