mypoliticalburner
MyPoliticalBurner
mypoliticalburner

this is THE serious stuff that is not exclusive to Trump. this is a decades long con that has been playing out accross the country. FLA’s purge the most glaring in 2000 but every state under Elephant control has been pushing this type of BS since the 80s. this is just the newest ploy to go along with Registration

Macron has previously called French colonialism a crime against humanity. I hardly think he’s acting culturally superior. He’s stating a simple matter of fact that high fertility rates continue to be a problem in impoverished African countries. High fertility rates are a problem in ANY impoverished and unstable area;

Who are actually some of the worst abusers of human trafficking, specifically children, and more specifically for the sex trade.

So, where is the collusion? That word is thrown around an awful lot lately, but there’s still zero proof of any actual collusion. For this meeting, supposedly the attorney had dirt on Russian money being funneled to the DNC; however the allegation never actually came to light and was never used.

I was just clarifying that Christianity is only responsible for about half of the the terrible repressive ideas in Africa. Otherwise, I agree.

Sooo, this Magnitsky Act is about to be repealed because it will “make america great again” by bringing in dirty money. Sweet.

Fusion Reach Around Day. Let’s make it a thing.

That can be rolled into Western colonialism for Christianity and Eastern colonialism for Islam. The fact that they are receptive to Abrahamic religion is an artifact of colonialism by both groups.

I’m not necessarily disagreeing with you, but I feel like before you can call his statements “racism,” you must at least address the veracity (or lack thereof) of his statements, and whether he believes the issues he’s referencing are the fault of the African people or Europe’s own colonial history (as he has said

I know right? And even if it was a Russian source, so what? Referring specifically to the leaks, here.

“Clearly she meant it in only the most positive way, and why aren’t we talking about the real issue, which is building a wall across Scotland to keep the Gauls out?”

However, it’s still debatable what kind of interference it was and to what degree. And there’s a fair bit of diversity of opinion on that matter. Just wanted to add that.