mykpfsu77
mykpfsu77
mykpfsu77

@thermopyle: So releasing the name of informants is a good thing to you I guess?

@SkipErnst: Gizmodo doesn't give a shit. They advocate rape if your one of the cool kids.

@bdinger: "No one dies" you mean except for the informants that Wikileaks names?

God Gizmodo, please just move out of the US. Seriously. You guys would cheer Iran or China if they launched a cyber attack against the US.

@intoSPACE: Its one thing if he is actually exposing corruption. But people don't "deserve" to know the name of Afghani informants, nor where missile components are made, or the codes to the presidents "football", or the location of nuclear weapons in Europe assuming they are secured and not lying around.

@cicadymn: Too bad step 1 is false. Second woman said only sex with a condom, he did not use a condon, she made appealS (as in plural) for him to stop, he did not. Thats pretty much the text book definition of rape.

@Y2KGTP: When you've already skipped court, they tend not to want to give you a chance to do it again.

Well maybe Assange will learn what happens when he tells someone to stop screwing him and his cellmate just keeps going.

"rape, sexual molestation and unlawful coercion.".

@NateN: Well since most of Jesus's article comes from Assange's lawyer we're seeing word games. The 2nd woman told him no, not just once but at least more then once. Assange's lawyer wants to say it was just about the condom. But at no point is it ever said she consented to sex without a condom and following basic

@hawkeye18 hath verily: Or they just don't want to bear the responsibility of being responsible for the death of informants.

"It's amazing that there are some people who, without knowing anything about the facts, think that they know better than the prosecutors and even the women who denounced Assange for not wearing a condom"

@ms. huberman: There has been a charge. The red notice by Interpol states it is an arrest warrant issues by the international prosecution office in Gothenburg. Red notices are only sent out for 2 reasons. "A distinction is drawn between two types of red notice: the first type is based on an arrest warrant and is

@thinkthis: English comprehension fail. First off it was her appealS, as in plural, more then one. Second the woman is not claiming to have gone along with it. Assange's lawyer (who is the only source for this, something Jesus doesn't want to reveal) says the sex went on. It is Assange's lawyer who says the woman

Are you fucking kidding me?! Jesus, your own article directly contradicts your statement. "....friends of the woman say that he did not complywith her appeals to stop unless he wore a condom.". So she demanded he stop having sex with her, and he continued. Thats the friggin definition of rape dumbass!

@Persistence: And the terrorist informants that gave us information to track down Al-Qaeda and the Taliban that Wikileaks proudly published their names? Those leaks which were then used by the Taliban to hunt down the informants? What about those people?

For the "But they hardly make any sound". Judging by the picture these turbines are in a mountainous area. You all do know that mountains will reflect the sound waves as they come in right? Unlike say a corn field. Also try reading the article which said "the noise generated exceeded the sound limits for nights.".

Actually they would not be legally immune and in fact would subject the government of Sweden to additional laws. For intsance since Assange doesn't give a crap who dies so he can be cool if any document is hosted by the Swedish gvoernment that leads to the death of anyone, the Swedish government immidiatly becomes an