when? when did he turned idea in succesful company (production company - I am stressing this)? succesfull means one that makes money from customers, not just from investors or subsidies.

used corolla

I am all for it. Objectification is bad.

there is difference between minimalism and poor/bad/cheap.

maybe he is going in reverse.

it is called crash-test. if it would be comprehensive all-in-all safety test, they would have to judge brakes, handling etc. They do not. It is crash test. But with higher and higher importance of stuff that will not help you in the case of crash. they can help you avoid, but e.g. line-monitoring is useless if you do…

no, but crashtest should only cover “already happened” scenario. It should tell you what will happen if you crash.

nowadays you score points and starts for electronic assistence systems. If you put there car with good structural pasive safety qualities but without electronic reminders etc, you would score low anyway.

in europe (in general) people use authorized services (pricey) when the(ordinary, not expensive) car is under warranty, when it is not (anymore) usually they use independent services (cheaper) for maintenance.

.

ok, he or she (or them) pays (pay) his life-expenses whatever they might be. better?

Well yeah. Somewhere in Enland guy who paints the cars at McLaren factory is paying his morgage and keeps his kids at school because this guy is ready (and capable) of spending so much for paint. etc.

kids are not responsible for their parents nor their parents’ actions.

pretty sure it is red, dude.

guy in the Aston won

problem with F1 started when they started to adjust tracks to the cars, not the cars to the tracks.

and remove the chicanes from Monza.

how much do you value 1 hour of your time?

styling-wise, they are copying the Civic Type R, and not even very well.

true, but nobody is telling you that you are inherently incapable of learning how to ride the horse. But he is telling us that nobody is suited to drive.