mushyheirloom-old
MushyHeirloom
mushyheirloom-old

@Roberto G.: Full-option, low-price sedan... like the Daewoo Lanos, Nubira, or Leganza? A tiny fraction of those are still on the road after a mere decade; Daewoo somehow failed to learn the lessons taught by Hyundai (which had gone from a total laughingstock to a somewhat competent automaker over the 15 years before

Hey, my 244 has battled crosswinds at nearly three times this fellow's speed without issue. Yeah, it's square, but not that square.

@_covert: A certain LeMons team agrees.

@tonyola: The later ones, yes. The ones that weren't sold as Cadillacs (because they weren't) and didn't have the 4100 (because it was rubbish); derivative Park Avenues and Ninety-Eights, as you said, were lovely in their own right.

@imiss2xwishbones: It says "FARGO" on it. That's really it. Possibly some trim bits, too.

@alextsmith: I run my 244 into trees at ~5 MPH (idling, foot moderately on the brakes) to demonstrate its durability. It doesn't even have the earlier, indestructible 'commando' bumpers...

@SmaartAasSaabr: The X-body cars would have been brilliant if they hadn't taken every possible opportunity to disassemble or grenade themselves.

@FromaBuick6: Now with more 5.0: A complete-base-model 2003 Impala was my driver's ed car, and I still maintain that it's the worst car I've ever driven. My daily driver is older than me and has a hilariously uncomfortable driver's seat and half of the centre stack missing, and yet, I'd rather drive my ancient Volvo,

@967-1111: I'd say the Pontiac LeMans is even less inspiring - the Chevette is rear-wheel-drive, not that it helps, and marginally more reliable.

@dbol1977: True, because Japan didn't have competition for those, but do include the downsized FWD models of 1985-'86 on.

@SynthOno: Mine was a 2003 Impala. Mediocre visibility, mediocre acceleration (with the 3.4), reasonable comfort, handling like an air mattress on an ice rink, but perhaps most importantly for a driver's-ed car, the worst brakes in any car I've driven (admittedly, everything I've driven has been from the late 1980s

@FromaBuick6: Now with more 5.0: A friend of mine had the passenger-side window of a Solstice blow in on him without warning. Between the quality issues and the visibility, it's a real shame.

@alextsmith: Quite probably - I was reckoning on a 5-7 MPH roll-into. For that matter, the rest of my rear end is nearly unstoppable below 10 MPH (old Volvo); the rest of this car can't say the same.

Go ahead - rear-end me with that thing. Trust me, it'll cost me two taillights and you a good amount of fabrication, plus the bumper cover that it's shoved back into.

@powermatic: Oh, yeah, it's fun when some moron in an Accord - as often as not, it's a beige/silver sixth-generation Accord - tries to run you off the road. Anyone who limits your reasonably-safe solutions to 'stab the brakes, fall back, turn on your high beams' and 'cut them off' is asking for trouble, especially

@bombastinator: I suspect Nvidia will be shoved out of the low end by Intel and AMD's integrated solutions, and they haven't been very competitive in the midrange (compared to AMD [ATI]) for a while, but Intel has never made a credible high-end video chipset (at least for consumer use). I don't know whether either

Y'know, Murilee, you aren't doing a great job of not making me want an old pickup...

@Novaload: Nah. Uh-oh, uh-oh, bitches hoppin' in my Volvo.