Good move, Valve. A platform should be an agnostic canvas for artists, not a playing field for corporations to push their morals on others. 

Astonishing.

She has an account of Woody Allen’s behavior that is clearly material to the conclusions in those two documents that you linked to. I’m not sure what you’re getting from pretending that it isn’t.

I wasn’t repeating his opinion (or even making reference to his account as ‘opinion’); my statement about the train was based on my own understanding of this case. If you have a link so I can read up, I’d be grateful for it.

No, I was talking about Mia Farrow’s account, which is referenced throughout both those documents, and is clearly a huge factor in the conclusions that they draw. But yes, let’s talk about Dylan Farrow’s account. It’s possible she is relaying the events exactly as they occurred. It’s possible that she’s relaying what…

He’s providing his opinion about whether a certain version of events is likely to have happened, based on his firsthand experience of the locations and events surrounding it. The only reasons for entirely rejecting that kind of testimony is if it either does not support a version of events that you have committed to…

Huh? It’s his account of his own childhood. Are we really being this selective about what type of victims of which type of abuse we choose to believe now?

Don’t believe the firsthand account. Believe the people who weren’t there!

The long article written by Moses Farrow recently made me think and I’m not sure Allen is guilty anymore.