Yeah, Wakanda company do but settle now?

lololol THAT was the highlight of your day? This is probably the single best self-own I’ve ever had the privilege to witness, thank you. Blessings and prayer hands emoji to you, you sad, sad little man.

Believing that Jesus rose from the dead is not a “fundie” thing.

Imagine having so much time that you’d willingly waste ANY of it on composing this comment.

LOLOL wait is binary thinking cool again? Guess I missed the memo...

Do you show intolerance toward all Christians? You’re a bigot. You “regard... members of a [religious] group with hatred and intolerance.”

Hoo boy, if I had the answer to this, I would have an awesome book deal.

Ah, and here’s the meat. So now, you’re deciding what is and what isn’t a credible Christian organization, based upon nothing but what you think you know.

In truth, “to be a Christian” merely means that you’ve accepted JC as a part of your spirit. I get that.

ProTip: I currently study religions as a part of my social scientific research, that I publish on. I haven’t once stated what I believe, but rather that I, as any good researcher would, believe that participants in my research who describe their own beliefs are not lying about believing in those things. I take their…

Look at all these anti-Christian sources you’ve cited, where non-Christians try to assert what Christians believe!

Not necessarily. You might be a scientist, for example, who believes in the possibility in something in the universe that transcends science.

No, not particularly great literature. But, there are people out there who like to build upon tradition. So, for example, there may be someone who grew up going to church but doesn’t believe that heaven or hell are literal places, who wants to incorporate some of the philosophy of Christian writings throughout the…

The people that you are describing aren’t Christians. Not really.

I send you all of the stars.

“Doesn’t faith oppose skepticism, empiricism and science?”

....Oh, another nice thing I can say: “Billy Graham has not uttered an antisemitic, homophobic, misogynist or bigoted word in several hours.”

Yeah, I think it’s your standard feel-good ones, if I’m not mistaken. I found the original “small price to pay” sentiment to be pretty aggressive lol.

Interesting theory! I kept waiting for the film to reveal that the fish man was responsible for injuring her in the first place, like on accident or something. (When he lashes out at other characters, the scratches resemble Eliza’s scars.)

How can Divorce be garbage if it’s created by Sharon Horgan, who can do no wrong?