Just curious, and I don’t really expect honesty, but how many parents here would feed their children sandwiches made by someone they knew was HIV positive?

It’s one thing for us to smugly occupy the moral highground when we risk nothing to do so. But when what we most care about in life is potentially at risk to even…

I can’t speak for any other guy, but I try to make sure my wife orgasms before I do, and it’s not necessarily a question of stamina, more paying attention to both of our, err, states of arousal and adapting as necessary.

Two words: Douche. Bag.

Following the links to the research cited about “false allegations” in the post:

“Don’t give governmentstudent loans to private institutions. Done.”

Family law judges are afforded very broad latitude in making judgment calls especially when it comes to the the “bests interests of children” in very emotionally charged situations, and that is what is going on here. Most of the people claiming to be family law lawyers I see posting here seem to be more or less in a…

“And like others have said, the only two people she’s allowed to really order around are the two parents, not the children.”

Key paragraph from from that article (emphasis added): “But it was Eibschitz-Tsimhoni’s contempt for the law, and her refusal to assume her parental responsibility, that led <b>Gorcyca and virtually every other professional who has come into contact with her</b> to conclude her children would be safer if they were…

“Judges typically have much discretion in deciding whom to hold in contempt and the type of contempt. Those held in contempt can include parties to a proceeding, attorneys, witnesses, jurors, people in or around a proceeding, and officers or staff of the court itself. - See more at: http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal…

Contempt of court is ALWAYS indeterminate since release is predicated on the choices of the person held in contempt. The entire purpose of such a finding is to compel behavior consistent to what the court orders.

I don’t doubt the imcompetence sometimes of the system, since I’ve experienced it as well. I do believe, however, that’s more a function of how overwhelmed it is, instead of blatant disregard for the best interests of the children.

This is an experienced judge asserting this is an outlier case. As someone and my kids…

We need to keep in mind the kids were remanded for contempt of court. Every judge I’ve ever met, and I’ve met more than a few, will not — and cannot — tolerate people ignoring their orders. Was this the best remedy? I don’t know. I do suspect it was an attempt to get the kids away from the influence of both parents to…

Read the transcripts and more detailed coverage of the case. It's out there, all you have to do is Google.

The kids were found to be in contempt of court for refusing an order by the judge. That’s why they were sent to Children’s Village. As a judge she has every legal right to hold anyone in contempt who doesn’t follow her orders.

Ît never ceases to amaze me that so many people feel so qualified to comment on complex issues without even doing a minimal amount of research into what is actually going on. If you really think this judge us acting in a vacuum then you have no real experience in family court. Why the hell aren’t you taking a good…

In my case, and I’m somewhat ashamed to admit it, I ended up proposing to my now wife while we were sitting on the living room floor sorting dirty laundry.

I don't know why it's more socially acceptable to say “black” than “colored,” but it is a sensitive issue in my marriage because my wife is a “coloured” South African— a very distinct ethnic label from black in their society. (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coloured for reference.) She gets annoyed when she's called…

Uh, the “victim” is the one that’s dead? Am I missing something, or does it come across like you're saying she deserved it.

I suppose it could be argued that 45 years is too long a sentence due to mitigating circumstances, but your post is nothing more than victim blaming.