I understand what you are trying to get at, but the dam analogy is not valid. A dam is an object with the purpose of impeding the flow of water, and whether it is made of dirt, wood, concrete or anything else, it still serves the same purpose, and its danger is inherent to its function. There is no way to stop the…

I am not quite following you there. A low res picture would look that same on both a low and high resolution screen assuming they are both displaying the image at its native resolution, i.e. not stretched or augmented in any way. No amount of screen resolution will ever improve a low resolution picture.

It's a two part process, the quality of the image will only ever be as good as the quality of the content. For example, low res apps are still going to look crappy and low res on the iPhone's "retina display."

Awesome.

Only if it was the same size and had the same image quality of a 2D version and at a comparable price, then sure.

That was a very confusing first statement. By that logic, a grenade is a perfectly safe paperweight as long as you don't pull the pin. I don't know if I would really regard that as safe.

I second this. There are some movies out there that you can make a case for and try to explain their merits, but the Big Lebowski is one of those where if you get it you get it, and if you don't you don't. It's just a movie about a man, and that man is the Dude, and the Dude... well look at me ramblin' on...

My 6 year old Dell E1505, which I still use daily. Great keyboard, great trackpad, and never once a BSOD. The best device I've ever purchased.

Yes to this, I don't see how or why you would do it any other way.

Shit, this has just reminded me of how I've managed to misplace my blu-ray of the movie.

There are dozens of tech sites out there with similar, if not the exact same content. What Giz and the rest of Gawker always seemed to have going for it was that it somehow, by the grace of God or something, has managed to avoid the tons and tons of shitty comments and other bullshit that the those other sites have to…

My theory is that they have just done this to set it up for their next update in which they reintroduce the scrolling/list view with some ridiculous name in the hopes that we will all be so impressed by how fluid and simple the new comment system has become. Genius!

This is the first thing I thought of, and I was surprised to see how finished the thing was. I was picturing something more along the line of this.

Oh look, a troll in the top three posts. Looks like the new system is really working its magic.

Oh look, a troll in the top three posts. Looks like the new system is really working its magic.

I am not totally against what they are trying to do, They just did not find a very user friendly way to do it. Like @Nicholas_Payne said, I really enjoyed scrolling quickly through the comments to find a nugget. I don't see why they couldn't use the concepts they are trying to promote (Discussion hierarchy, user…

Wow I haven't seen Dilbert in a long time, I'd forgotten how subdued the voice acting was.

awesome.

No one will ever see this.