It seems like promo videos like these always seem to have a feature where you can stream something from your phone to your TV, but this is never implemented. Moreover, no one ever does, nor ever will want to stream something from their phone to their TV. Not more than the one time to try it out.

Maybe it differs by breed, our dog falls all over the place in the car.

Does anyone else look at this render and immediately think Norwhal.

As good as the building looks, it's a shame they are going to brand it with this fugly logo. Is that really the best they could come up with?

Well it's getting pretty close to 300 and I don't see the streets getting crazier. I will just assume that the people planning American cities just looked at Europe and said "Let's not do that."

I don't know why I am going to bother with this, but just about everything you said there is complete nonsense.

I am not really up on London history, so did they just pave over every random horse path in the development of that city. It looks like they just neglected any semblance of order in terms of urban planning.

I would like to see someone Photoshop out the 747 so it just looks like the Shuttle zipping around NYC.

Except they aren't?

It's actually a shuttle shuttle.

I think it's probably best that they don't change the current design too much. Making it too good looking might cause a false sense on comfort, and could lead to less caution when considering items.

I have to agree with you. While many of these are quite good, there are also some the illustrate the idea that just making a picture black and white does not make it good.

Are you saying that it is dangerous to use an extension cord with a window A/C unit, but they are built with a short chord on purpose?

No, It's 3D! As in...

gross.

YOU'RE A MAD MAN!

Thanks for the explanation. If I understand you correctly, it all comes down to shooting standards vs. playback standards, and the industry's refusal to adapt to technology.

Brilliant!

Would someone mind quickly explaining why they give the option for shooting in 23.98 and 29.97. Is it something to do with encoding or does changing the time-code affect the editing process in some way? It seems like it would be too small of a difference to not be a significant factor somehow.

You just need these.