Yes. And the rights specifically protected in the Constitution are the toughest to revoke. It could be done, but it would be very tough.

Did you forward this around to your coworkers?

You mean, besides the whole zombie thing?

Mercury

The Justice League cartoons do a great job of making it seem normal to call people by the superhero names when it’s appropriate. They just do it and it works. Why is WB making this so difficult? This isn’t even the hard part of making good superhero movies.

You’d have to amend the Constitution to outlaw guns. That’s very difficult to do, especially when this is such a longstanding and foundational part of it.

Being a fucking moron hurts your credibility far, far more. If you think anyone other than the player is to blame you are dumb as a fucking rock.

You’re missing a nuance of the word, “result.” I’m not saying he didn’t mean to lower his shoulder. I’m saying he wouldn’t have done it if there was no collision.

The grammar at issue here isn’t the comma, it’s the conditional statement, “if y’all think I did it.” The suspect prefaced the request for a lawyer (or lawyer dog) with a condition, which meant if any of the officers didn’t think he did it, then there would be no request for a lawyer... or a lawyer dog.

If senators want to increase their security, that’s fine. It’s just that this seems to be one of those things that it’s really hard to guard against and still be practical.

OK. So... in anticipation that a crazy neighbor might jump you while you’re mowing your lawn you... change what exactly?

No. That is a terrible way to think. I doubt you would like your neighbor tackling you for the way you voted. 

You have no authority here.

I like to watch people who are good at their jobs do their jobs well, and have fun doing it. I’d never heard of him before this movie but I can already tell I’d like him.

I said, “convince.” I didn’t say, “make them understand.”

It’s not about forcing childbirth. It’s about the balance between medical rights and the potentiality of human life. That’s what the SC decided in Roe vs. Wade. There is a balance. As medical science has advanced since the 60s, there’s more evidence of the potentiality of human life at earlier points. That’s what…

It’s going to be tough to successfully argue the follow through wasn’t art of a reasonable attempt to minimize harm to himself. An attorney could say he was stumbling after the collision. You might be convinced, but analysis of someone’s body movements in a grainy smartphone video is very subjective.

Well, to convince me (or a jury) of that, you’re probably going to need to do video analysis and determine the speed and vectors of each person. That’s difficult, but there’s a writer for Wired who does a lot of that stuff to disprove action movie scenes, so maybe you can get his help calculating the momentum of the…

Those are not my arguments. If they were, I’d join you in opposing them.

Arguing such a large athlete should have come to a stop in such a short period of time is going to be VERY difficult.