This is just an aside, but I do often wonder why so many bad men have personal internet blogs.
This is just an aside, but I do often wonder why so many bad men have personal internet blogs.
I would argue that masculinity, or our conceptions of it, is a mental health crisis
It would seem very hard to obstruct justice for a crime that never happened! Witch Hunt!
Nah, the Ottoman Empire was in existence then, and they were frequently referred to as “Turks”, after the Seljuk Turks who invaded Anatolia well in advance of the 1700s. King Charles XII totally might’ve said he got the recipe from “Turkey.” Or Anatolia. Or Eastern Thrace. Or Byzantium. Or whatever.
*recitation of glossary entries from a pharmacology text book.
Right? I still cringe when patients/clients talk about therapy like it’s this horrible thing for only horrible people, even though it’s theoretically my job to direct them to it.
This. Plus it’s like a professional development event every session you attend. I.e., “My therapist CBT’d really well like x, and I think I’ll try it on my client.”
Nah, talking to people about their thoughts and feels all day is mad stressful. Unless they’re talking about her obsessively needing to provide therapy. Maybe all of the above? That would be a weird twist.
Neither. Here’s what the internet says:
...citing the risk of its not being cooked at hot enough temperatures to kill any nasties.
Imagine if Woodrow Wilson tweeted. It might be slightly more coherent, but still pretty racist. What do you think the odds are that Trump’s fetish for rallies over governing will similarly lead to his incapacitation and eventual stroke?
Ends justify the means. If I agree with you, it’s super cool that you’re an evil Cheeto dusted fuckstick.
You could say that Elijah Wood ≠ Toby Maguire but if you look at their pictures side by side...
For me it’s the critical lack of insight we have for individuals with mental health issues both in and outside of prison. They’re punishing her in such a way that will almost certainly make her worse. It bumps against the “cruel and unusual” given that. We want to apply a uniform standard of punishment for criminals,…
Working in healthcare, these types of questions are frustratingly stupid. You don't just do tests for the edification of randos, and "neuro-cognitive" tests aren't done for people who have no other indication of having any sort of issue with functioning. It's hard to get those tests for the severely impaired…
For as advanced as marketing psychology is, you’d think they’d know that. Worse, they probably do and are like, “Whatevs. Can probs still manufacture enough demand for stupid champagne-colored side mirrors and eye-liner headlights to make this worth it. Also, ROI, paradigm shift, business, synergistic, capital gains.”
I’m pretty sure men do all of these things, too.
Right? And even if they did think you were buying them for something you might do for yourself... who cares? They can’t possibly find it that interesting or amusing. They work in a place that sells tampons, and it’s kind of self-important to assume they’re spending any significant part of their day worrying about wtf…
They keep referring to their abnormal relationship as “addictive” but I think the pathological descriptor they’re looking for is “co-dependent.” This should be an Intro to Psych case study.
I am a man. I have bought tampons. I do not see the issue with buying tampons. It helps to not be so cripplingly insecure that buying something that someone you care about needs doesn’t threaten your very identity. Because that’s super dumb.