You made the right choice... you weren’t getting a new or used GT2 for GTI money anyway. You don’t want the others.

All that AND it costs $50,000. A KIA being a KIA is to be expected... but when it costs as much as a Q50 Red Sport it’s hilarious.

...replied to wrong post

Pricing, the KIA way.

It’s got to be the 6,000 miles because that’s crazy people money.

There’s a reader contingent on this site that thinks this car is outdated. It’s frankly... hilarious.

You and I have a very different interpretation of awful...

At this point I’ll be more surprised when Trump says something factual... let alone intellectual.

FLICKR!?!? Wait, I though Yahoo killed them?

You’re worried about my experience? You said you were surprised a GTI had more punch than a BRZ...

YOU DONT FIRE ME! I QUIT!

If a hatch was what I wanted I’d easily take a GTI over a 30k Veloster... it’s not even close.

Because for the same money you could have a faster, more capable WRX that isn’t FWD? and also isn’t a Hyundai? Hardly a dumb take... maybe dumb comprehension?

Are you surprised the GTI had more punch?... as it has for the entirety of the BRZ/86's existence? Like an entire second faster to 60 more punch. If you buy a performance package N you’ll be spending 30k+... Have fun explaining that purchase when the new WRX comes out next fall.

The R34 had already outclassed Porsche a decade earlier. Frankly, I would have been surprised if the R35 didn’t set records.

They pretty much did.

Yeah because Nissan had no experience with turbos up until the R35...

This isn’t a “production” Tesla.. It’s a heavily modified stripped out Tesla on track tires. Who cares. A modified Suzuki Escudo does 5 minute Nurburgring Lap Times on Gran Turismo 2... and has essentially the same article worthiness.

The debut pretty much is a greatest hits album. It’s ridiculous. I was roller skating to Cars songs in real-time as a kid. Nothing beat “Just What I Needed” or “Let’s Go” when floating on the 4-wheels.

You: This is actually a size class below the Fit.