I just don’t even know what to say to that.
*looks at your username. Oh.
I just don’t even know what to say to that.
*looks at your username. Oh.
Ok, let’s unpack this.
#1 I think cryptocurrency is silly, but just because you think it’s silly doesn’t mean that it’s necessarily a scam.
#2 Did this sherpa accompany them at his own free will? If so, saying that “they got him killed” is just dishonest. If they dragged him along against his will then I would agree…
Well, if we’re going to go that route, then I’ll say that there’s 2 outs with second open and a 3-1 count. A pitcher in that situation, facing a batter like Stanton, is not going to give him a pitch to hit. With no outs? Perhaps he takes his chances. Two outs? He’s not going to risk putting one in the seats. So…
So you’re just assuming that because he’s been accused by someone that was openly and admittedly attempting to extort him, that he’s guilty? Ok then.
You say “victim”. Sounds like you are making an assumption. Perhaps others are making opposite assumptions? Who’s wrong?
It’s not an “unfortunate” system. It’s a “complicated” system. So many of these accusations are essentially “unprovable”. There’s no video, no text messages, no semen, nothing. So unless someone flat out admits to it, how do you prove it, and how can the criminal justice system work in that instance?
I think you should go watch Billy Madison and eat some ice cream.
Haha, that’s one thing that we can jokingly agree on (the first part). So quick to judge and play your atheist card.. I’m sorry for you.
My line of reasoning? If not falling into the trap of making broad assumptions about something is considered a “line of reasoning”, then that’s what I’ll claim to be doing.
I don’t think any of you really smart, enlightened folks even read the article.
You clearly didn’t read the article. I award you no points, and may god have mercy on your soul.
So, just because they are “rich” (you have no idea if they are in fact rich or not), they are assholes?
Why do people always say that “I don’t like this car because it has X or Y design element of this more shitty car”. That makes no sense. There’s only so many ways you can make the sausage. Some people say that the Audi A5/S5 sportback looks like a ford focus. Ok....... So one design element of the sportback’s front…
If you ever had any credibility, you lost it all by claiming that the exterior of this car is an abomination.
Why would their sentences be considered “extreme” just because they ripped off Amazon? Stealing is stealing. Some of the corporation hating liberals on this website are just strange.
How is her decision “malicious” exactly? She chose to not accept an invitation to join a team. Look up the definition of malice and get back to me.
How is she being shitty to her fellow man? She is refusing to wear a jersey that is in support of something she doesn’t believe in.
Finally, an athlete making a sacrifice to support something they believe in instead of just getting down on one knee in public. What kind of sacrifice is that?
No matter what it does or what it’s exterior looks like, it still has an outdated, outclassed interior. One of the big reasons I won’t consider buying BMW
How about all hard copy magazines in general, which has been happening for the last 10 years.