mrman12345
MrMan12345
mrman12345

I guess that’s a good way to look at it, and now that I read that, I agree. I used to say “they shouldn’t be worth the same”, but to your point, it’s a testament to the game design that it feels just as good whether you found it behind a wall or you found it after a 15 minute secret run.

So you’re comparing collecting korok seeds to collecting power moons, when the two game mechanics serve completely different purposes and have completely different weight.

You must collect power moons to advance in the game - they ARE the game.

You don’t have to collect a single korok seed to beat BOTW.

I fail to see the

It’s so funny how so many short-sighted people compare oil subsidies to EV subsidies

It’s not that they CAN’T innovate, it’s that they don’t WANT to innovate if no one is buying the product. But the truth is, many manufacturers are dumping a lot of money into EV R&D in anticipation of increasing demand.

In what way are the consumers that “need” the tax credit “penalized”, as you call it? Why do they need an electric vehicle in order to be driving a “reasonable” form of transportation?

Yes, along with their own money as well in a bet that demand will increase.

You all are looking soooo short term. Yes, at this very moment, perhaps some demand is being stifled because of high cost of entry. Have you noticed how many hundreds of millions of dollars manufacturers are dumping into EV R&D? This will translate into a wider range of options, making EV’s more accessible.

Manufacturers are already innovating. They are pouring hundreds of millions into EV R&D if you haven’t noticed. We’re still in the early stages of the life-cycle (post Tesla). Over time, more and more options will come out and EV’s will become cheaper and more accessible.

What we need is a path forward with regard to

What sense does it make for the government to subsidize someone’s purchase of an EV?

Just because their is a limited offering of options at this point, so they are towards the high end of the price spectrum? That’s not a very good reason.

Over time, more and more options will come out (have you noticed how every

If electric vehicles are that great, then people will buy them. When more and more people buy them, more and more models come out, the price range widens along with the number of options, and they become cheaper.

Why should the taxpayer saddle the up-front burden of someone buying an EV? Again, if they are that great,

Perfect example of dumb political agenda. Or, as is noted on several websites when I googled “portuguese man o war”... They can be washed up onto beaches by high winds.


Or, he’s mostly interested in clearing his name, and she’s the one that tarnished it in the first place, so maybe he sued her for that reason. If you sue someone else, you aren’t directly ‘attacking’ the person that defamed you.

Wait, let me get this straight -

So some unknown, magic money tree is going to fund the research necessary to get us into space, mine the minerals and come back.

And we’re going to find all of this magic money before we are able to produce enough batteries to meet increasing demand, because, you know, once you start

Wait, let me get this straight -

So some unknown, magic money tree is going to fund the research necessary to get us into space, mine the minerals and come back.

And we’re going to find all of this magic money before we are able to produce enough batteries to meet increasing demand, because, you know, once you start

Aurelio’s - right on

Tourists go to Lou Malnati’s

Cool pictures. Who do you suggest pays for the massive amounts (billions and billions) of dollars that it’s going to cost to get renewable technologies to the point that their energy density, among other important metrics, make them economically feasible?

You have to answer that question first.

Even the oil and gas industry recognizes that we cannot continue in our current direction forever. It’s the people that are calling for 100% renewable energy right now that are whacked out in the head and have no sense of reality.

There’s a balance somewhere, and it’s “how do we strike that balance going forward?”

Then

Where’s the highlight of him high-stepping to first?

It’s against stadium policy, end of story. Abort.

From website:

It’s pathetic that people with serious, documented cases of dementia and loss of movement are now fodder for political reasons. Is it “weird” that he does those things? Yes, of course it’s weird. Is it “inappropriate”? Yes, it’s inappropriate when you’re looking at it in a vacuum.

My grandmother had dementia to a