You can fuck up, and then you can apologize and do better. I’d like to say it’s not that hard, but it apparently is?

I’m never going to get over the hordes of people wringing their hands and gnashing their teeth immediately after his semi-”downfall” about the path towards redemption/forgiveness for people like him.

A path towards betterment can and should exist to some extent, but most of these fuckers never want on it. Louis feels…

Fuck, this is just lazy and sad and pathetic.

I absolutely was this person too; I funded two surgeries at 8k each for my rescue dog (I’m child-free so I don’t feel bad dropping that type of cash because this is my companion and pet insurance covered about 1/3 of it), treated her Cushing’s Disease, her allergies, and whatever else she needed.

and yet you commented...

Keep in mind that none of us know enough to say whether she should be in a conservatorship or not.

This shit would never happen to a man.

Imagine being a grown ass adult and having to beg a court for years and years just for permission to not have a toxic person you have a terrible relationship have near total control over your life.  What a completely fucked up, dehumanizing “justice” system we have, top to bottom, in every area.

I do, however, wish the governments of the world *would* plan for a doomsday variant better than they planned for our current situation, perhaps things wouldn’t be quite so shit and maybe there wouldn’t be millions of unnecessarily dead people in a year.

There is one difference, Law & Order always puts a disclaimer at the beginning of every episode that says this is a fictional story and they never, to my knowledge say anything like, “this is inspired by (insert real life) case” which is what apparently Damon’s movie is doing.

Mining Amanda Knox’s ordeal for entertainment (by basically reproducing the story, but the names changed/serial numbers filed off,) is not new. Law & Order: SVU did it at the end of last year (Season 22, Ep. 3.) What makes Stillwater’s producers particularly classless is that they’re going around town explicitly statin…

I mean the director told vanity fair it’s inspired by her story so yea now people can definitely tell.

The “inspired by the Amanda Knox saga” tied it to her, and she has a right to push back. Your flippant comment is asinine.

If you click through her twitter thread, the media is using her image and her name on all features about the film, because the filmmaker explicitly named her as the inspiration for the film. So her name, likeness, etc. are all being used without her consent, to make other people (mostly already rich white men!) money,…

FWIW, her family were basically penniless after all the court battles, legal fees, flying back and forth to Italy, paying for a place to stay, etc. They’ve been honest about how the book advance went back to Italy in the form of paying all her debts - like, she literally HAD to write the book to not have her fam go…

So not only does she not have the right to her own name, but you also think she doesn’t have the right to try and reclaim that stolen agency? That's an incredibly asinine point of view for you to take. 

Every girl who lives near Matt Gaetz should own a whistle and mace.

“We have you on video sir, you’re blowing a whistle, damaging people’s hearing.”

My favorite part about that proud boy chucklefuck’s letter is that he failed white supremacist tryouts (insert Jimmy Jump laugh here)

Margie Q Greene and Matt PizzaGaetz getting publicly ridiculed and called out for the frauds that they truly are? AND a free gogo band show? Sign me up!