Wow...thanks for a liberal interpretation of being conservative. So, if you are a liberal thinker, you think along these lines... Your life is yours to do what you want with it, so long as it doesn’t negatively impact my life, or others. We are free to disagree with one another. In some instances, our individual…
MrBlah
mrblah
No. Just don’t. BMW doesn’t need encouragement. The X4 and X6 are a blemish on the face of all things automotive and should be pushed back into the depths of hell where they originated. For all I care, they can take BMW’s CR-V (X3) with it. They have no place in this world and the blind mush minds are only making…
Don’t.
As much as I hate the Wrangler for everything other than what it says right here, it really ought to headline this list. You need to go military or maybe a Ural truck to find a wheeled vehicle capable of handling such improbable terrain.
Was this a paid advertisement?
So, a bunch of brand new, shiny, $50,000-$100,000 trucks...
For fucks sake.
Stop it. Stop. DO NOT LOOK FOR A REPLACEMENT FOR THE XB. WE DO NOT NEED ANOTHER FUCKING SQUARE CAR.
You know why Scion is useless? It’s because they’re absolutely shite at making cars for their supposed demographic. Oh sure they almost got it right on paper.
The xB: It’s a fucking cardboard box with a lawnmower engine…
Yes I am a little biased, but you might want to include the 128i into the loop. Yes, that’s the one with the NA straight six. The turbo has the power, but the NA I6 in the 1 series was just about BMW’s last enthusiast’s car. Stiff chassis, small, nimble, high revving straight 6, and maybe the most important...…
1. IMS wasn’t an issue on the 1999s, as they are the only ones to use a proper dual row bearing (don’t make me get the full blown legal study showing a less than 1% failure rate). Also, anyone can have the IMS replaced for $2,500 or less. I personally will be picking up a 99 C4 this spring to strip down and road rally…
Not that I’m biased or anything, but I think my new-to-me everyday car is going to look pretty good in a few more years as well.
The entire rear end of this car is an automotive design war crime. Awful.
That’s because the majority of Americans elected Republicans - to stop Obama from doing stupid things with our tax dollars.
Where in the US Constitution does it grant any of the three branches of government the enumerated powers to manage the products that are produced and sold?
That’s funny, I thought his administration was only good for destroying things not building them...
Yeah, with lots of 20th century union contracts
Um....except, they did focus on the dick measuring contest...damn near first thing they mentioned was it’s the largest truck bed, with 1600 lbs payload capacity. As for usability, the fucking spare is under the truck bed, not under the truck...that’ll be fun with 1000 lbs of dirt/pickets/rock in the back. This is a…
Adding extra compartments in the bed is pretty easy when you REMOVE 4" of bed depth and then switch to a space saver spare. Seems like a lot of compromises for a gimmick storage area that will certainly fill up with leaves and muck.
My Mom always said people that swear lack the vocabulary to properly describe the situation. “Lazy pieces of shit” -Alissa-, yeah Mom was right. This piece is a sad excuse for journalism.
The Reuters report says they may buy back one-fifth of the diesel cars affected, which is 115,000 units. They’re not offering “one-fifth of MSRP” for the models or anything similar. #corrections