You asked a question, making a point with which I disagreed. I explained why I disagreed, politely. You responded, I responded back. I’m sorry if that came across as mansplaining, but to me it sure seemed like good faith engagement on a platform designed to facilitate conversations. But sure...

You asked if it wouldn’t be more appropriate to keep the clip in because Pete is a bad guy. I explained why the fact that he’s a bad guy doesn’t make the clip better. Then you struck the “I don’t really care about this issue that I commented on” pose, and I responded that the level of your care about the specific…

Sure, satire is allowed to touch sensitive subjects, but how it touches on it matters. This makes light comedy out of really objectionable actions that were and are all too real and which were covered up. And the reason that it made light comedy from that subject is because at the time the subject wasn’t taken very…

I don’t know how seriously, or not, you’re taking him. It’s not really relevant anyway.

I thought that it was funny as well, but I was also 19 in 1999. Since that time, I don’t think that sexual harassment is super funny.

It’s supposed to be a laugh line about women being sexually harassed. Cutting it doesn’t mean that Hollywood sexual assaults didn’t happen, but it does mean that we don’t think that it’s light comedy anymore either.

It’s supposed to be a laugh line about women being sexually harassed. Cutting it doesn’t mean that Hollywood sexual assaults didn’t happen, but it does mean that we don’t think that it’s light comedy anymore either.

Another way of saying it: Disney removes a scene in which a character does something creepy which was originally intended as a hilarious joke to make the audience laugh, but which in 2019 doesn’t, or at least shouldn’t.

Alternatively, this is a movie which already was watched by millions of kids, and with a sequel in theaters was going to get even more kids to watch it again, and removing a joke that has dated extremely badly is not a bad thing.

The important part is that it’s played for laughs. Keep in mind that this is a faux blooper real. People came up with an idea for this vignette, wrote it, and animated it with the hope that seeing a lecherous old man attempt to coerce sisters to have sex with him in exchange for helping with their careers would get…

Yep, he was resurrected at the tail end of the third season of the show, and then the fourth “season” was really just a two-part made for TV movie that was really just a last gasp to introduce a bunch of new characters that they could release as toys.

Yep, same here, more or less. I like the look of BotW, but the story wasn’t compelling enough for me to press through the combat, which I found annoying.

I guess she was fed up with him.

Getting kicked off Twitch and out of E3 is not relevant to the question of whether he committed a crime, nor is the possibility of civil law suits. I honestly don’t know if filming people in a bathroom is illegal, but I suspect that it does violate some number of laws, and if that is indeed the case then he should be…

Twitch and E3 are private companies with their own codes of conduct. Whatever actions they took are irrelevant to whether these actions are criminal violations.

Without defining what it means to be “good”, this is kind of a dumb topic. Every performer has some variability in their performances, with some actors turning in fantastic performances in one piece and a terrible performance in another. It’s hard to say why that is; maybe it’s the actor’s mood or things happening in…

I didn’t say that it was new. I did say that he perfected it, but perhaps it would have been better to say that he was the first to be wildly successful with it. Now that he’s had this huge success, other players are going to take a hard look at his strategy and attempt to replicate his success. Obviously most won’t…

Agreed, the nice thing about taking a category from top to bottom is that you get progressively harder questions on a same topic. It gives the game a nice flow.

It will be intriguing to see them play, especially because now Holzhauer’s strategy is out of the bag. He won a lot of money as the first person to really perfect it, but I wouldn’t be surprised if other players start using those strategies very soon, and hopefully old mainstays like Rutter and Jennings pick up on…

I mean, fair, but the question is what that accomplishment means and how it stacks up to Jennings’ win-streak. The win-streak is a massive accomplishment that nobody else has even come close to replicating.