Calling someone a professional victim is not pointing the finger at them for the harassment. It does, however, mean that they have benefited in some tangible way from it. Brianna Wu has abandoned her game, she is now bankrolled entirely by victim bucks. Sarkeesian is years overdue on her series and has moved entirely…

Link to what? Be more specific.

KiA is entitled to vote for what panels they want, and I too share their feelings of being fed up with seeing the same fear mongers and professional victims show up on panel after panel, especially when people like Randi Harper are among some of the worst harassers in this whole thing. The “harassment” you’re talking…

You really haven’t said anything for me to refute, but if you want ethics:

That isn’t proof. The thing that really frustrates me about anti gamers is how intellectually lacking you are, and how poorly you try to make their points.

I doubt it, but most of us will be filming any and all interactions with anti GG for both archival and protection purposes.

They are going to be forced to back up their allegations that GG was behind the harassment, which is why Randi and the like are talking about pulling out.

Take that up with SXSW. Savepoint wanted their own panel.

Proof of harassment?

Why, am I “triggering” you right now? Because nothing I’ve said is even remotely harassment.

Would your proof look anything like that, by chance? Because we have established long ago that using a hashtag is not proof of association. You would need to go to the places where GG gathers, and find evidence of people organizing harassment, people agreeing with it rather than condemning it, and then acting on it.…

You either have proof or you don’t. In the absence of proof, you have no grounds to make accusations that GG is in any way connected to harassment. IE, you are a liar.

If GG were going around lopping the heads off of unethical journalists, the writer of this article wouldn’t even be here right now.

So... you have no proof? The cool thing is, Savepoint plans to address this very thing at the new panel, and the poor ways in which the media has handled it, as well as often colluding to do so.

ISIS likes going after journalists, so that isn’t the worst comparison I’ve heard.

Suits me fine. We have Lynn Walsh of the SPJ and Mercedes Carrera going, who know quite a bit about taking apart a narrative. Randi Harper is already shitting over it and might pull out, because these people absolutely refuse to back their shit up in the face of people who can poke holes in their stories.

I think I’d have to smack a bitch that tried to get me ticketed for the way I sit. Thats just asinine.

Here’s another one for you:

0.66%, actually.

U mad? U mad.