Actually, accusations of infidelity are generally defamation per se, so she wouldn’t have to prove she was harmed. That part would only be relevant in the amount of the verdict, and punitive damages are allowed there.
Actually, accusations of infidelity are generally defamation per se, so she wouldn’t have to prove she was harmed. That part would only be relevant in the amount of the verdict, and punitive damages are allowed there.
Fun fact: “cultural fit” is also a good way to not have to hire women or minorities. Or at least it’s an excuse.
Have you seen his political coverage the last couple of decades?
Also, Woodward has kinda been terrible for a while now. He’s just coasting off of that one story.
if they would have reported on her allegations had they been against a local judge rather than Supreme Court nominee.
Is the 1 Tomato or one of the racist cranks?
Grifting is begging for money for something you don’t actually believe in. The fraud is what makes it grifting, not the trying to get money.
That would be because there isn’t a single organization that employs all those teachers.
I absolutely did too.
How do you trust that you can beat him at the polls when the whole problem is that he's using the federal government to try to cheat the election?
Said infrastructure bills would still have to be paid for and get past Trump, who has already blown up multiple attempts to do similar things.
Dispair is one thing. I don’t see how you connect impeachment to literally anything else on your list, nor what it has to do with the inability to accomplish any of the above. And the disconnect is so clear, and the framing of it as a progressive cause which you are abandoning is so nonsensical, that it reads more…
I thought that too, but it’s an account with 100+ followers. Like, a legit person typed that and presumably meant it.
Gotta say, I was 99% sure this was a one comment troll account.
Spoiler:
Yeah, I don’t really see how he doesn’t lose. This ruling isn’t a surprise either, it just means he can keep going and add on more fees.
Liquidated damages and hard caps like this one are regularly thrown out. The big surprise here is that there's wasn't a binding arbitration clause.
That is a strange one comment account. If someone created an account just to insult you, why isn’t their name on topic?
For what?