While I agree, having an expert join you for the inspection is a great idea, I’ve found in my case (Turbo Dodges), I have more knowledge than “experts”.

I track our 95. Supercharged 3.3L V6, lowered, etc.

Look older. The new ones have garbage transmissions, are extremely overweight, and drive like pigs.

It’s lowered 3" now. Riding on Shadow struts, axle flip, large sway bars. Running an Eaton M90 on the 3.3L V6, it’s making around 300hp/300ft-lbs.

Supercharged V6 would be much smarter.

You mean it’s not common sense to inspect things before buying them?

It’s a crossover, how much more compromise do you need?

I feel they should remove all the distractions in vehicles.

How about instead of ruining a classic name by slapping it on a wagon, they just come up with a new name?

Better:

It’s usually leaded, which will destroy your fuel system, so they say.

And then remember there is 22yrs of extra tech in there.

Don’t waste your time. I couldn’t believe how uninspiring they felt to drive.

Friend of mine has had 2 of these. They are incredible off road in stock trim.

This gen of Prelude is a far more enjoyable car to drive than the BRZ/FRS. The twins are slightly faster 0-60, but they don’t offer the same experience.

I had an 89 2.0 SI 4ws. I would venture to guess that this one was not a 2.0SI, but rather the 2.1L, which to my knowledge did not come with 4ws.

It wasn’t quick, but it would kill just about anything in the twisties.

Prelude would run low 8 0-60, cornered like it was on rails, and could crack off 32mpg+. That was from a non-Vtec 2.0 making 135hp.

Found one of those for $200 for a friend of mine. Almost no rust aside from the filler neck, which was literally falling out. He bought it, put a new neck on, camo’d it (I have no idea, was his thing at the time), and drove it for 6yrs.

Painted valve cover +50hp.