I'm not actually offended. The point of the statement was to show you I'm not waffling on about nothing in regards to how perspective matters in trolling. Was it that subtle? My point of view on how you expressed your opinion, at least based on your prior comment, supposedly gives me the right to call you a shitty…

I don't remember asking that, but it's alright.

Except I never said that, of course there are morals and ethics in the world. But theyre relative terms. People dont live by the same morals, and thats okay. What is wrong is someone trying to tell me what i should care about, and then mocking me for not agreeing with them. What you were talking about wasn't…

And if I had used a more appropriate word, your comment wouldn't really exist in the form it does. Hence why it's semantics. Harping on the use of outrage doesn't get us anywhere.

Because if it didn't exist, we would still be living in caves running from whatever species wouldve taken the place we humans currently hold on the food chain. Again, natural selection. Life is nothing but competition since basically the day we're born. That's why grades exist in schools, thats why better grades…

Then outrage is a poor choice of words. That doesn't necessarily change my argument though.

And youre someone who would rather blame others than take responsibility for your own emotions. If youre insecure enough to let meaningless words from anonymous people ruin your day, then you deserve the misery. No one makes you care.

Outrage isn't always a negative reaction. It's about perspective and that's the difference. If you're the butt of the joke, you're obviously going to take it differently than those who arent. And those who arent may see that attempt at outrage as funny. See, so it's not always negative. Its about a certain point…

I wouldnt call that trolling though. Just look at the crap Gerald is saying. It's given maybe one moment of thought and it's purpose is more to cause outrage than hurt. People that devote more than that moment are just being mean, not trolling. There is a difference. And that's how you know they just don't care,…

Wow, try not to take yourself too seriously, jeez. Maybe take South Park's advice. Who the hell cares if your article could be seen as condoning trolling. Do you know why people are trolls? Because they can separate the online from the real. Hence why they don't care what they write to others. Because trolling,…

Anything beginning with the word "Says" and the risk analyst point. Like I said before, quoting somebody and saying it's true that they said that isn't fact checking. And the fact that a couple risk analysts decided to let their bias against Trump allow them to say he's worse than terrorism is an obvious farce. I…

Lol. Restating direct quotes from people isn't actually proving anything. Thats not even close to real fact checking. The idea that Donald Trump said that pregnant women are an inconvenience doesn't surprise me nor do I doubt he said it. But don't quote him and then try to get a "gotcha" moment because you can…

So the media rates each candidate based on degrees of truthfulness. Yeah I'm certain that no biases could possibly find their way into those ratings. Here's the thing, lying and telling the truth is a black and white concept. When a website decides to grade you on whose lie was worse, it should raise a red flag or…

Youre the one who brought up Wallace as a comparison to Trump, segregation was a calling card for Wallace. Maybe you took me too literally. What I was specifically asking for was an example of how Trump is going to use his presidency to oppress millions of minorities. That is your fear right? How does he do it?…

Okay, how does Trump bring back segregation like ol' Georgey?

Okay I just checked my calender, and I can confirm that it's no longer the 1960s. Segregation is dead. And I'm quite certain it can't come back. Citing the political landscape of a racist man in the deep south 50 years ago is about as relevant as citing Nazi Germany. Let me clarify. A racist and narcissistic…

Your description of Trump could easily apply to Hillary, it might actually be more apt for her. But you're criminally underestimating the timeline. Clinton's corruption is literally decades old. And the reason it's far worse than Trump's is because Hillarys brand of evil occurs mostly in the public sector. You…

Of course I don't want to vote for the jackass, and I probably won't vote this year. The purpose of voting is so that an individual can attempt to get people into office that match up best with their own ideologies. Neither candidate does that for me, so I'll likely pick neither. But if you twisted my arm, I would…

I think campaigning is very much the same as being president. Its about the ability to win over people to your idea of the "solution" to the country's ills. The purpose of our government was never intended to be what it's become. None of our politicians, including our current president, understand federalism, the…

That doesn't answer my question. I've already admitted that Trump is pretty much everything you've declared him to be. You really just repeated yourself. But I will disagree that he doesn't know how government and economics work. It appears that he supports more free trade ideals in regards to the economy which I…