Jezebel is angrier about this than it is about Nate Parker.

So my previous post on here being critical of Jezebel was censored after being up for at least 12 hours. I’m writing this one just so someone at Jez is forced to read it.

Just understand, ladies, this is your Jerry Sandusky. Someone who very clearly escaped facing consequences for raping a defenseless person because of…

So all of you think we should just have segregated movies? Movies written by white people should feature white characters and movies written by black people should feature black characters?

Jez deleted my comments being critical of this article, too.

I guess so. Although as Ozthewerewolf points out, the Bowie escapade had me wondering, and I’m still confused as to why people feel so comfortable supporting Hillary’s way of dealing with Bill’s accusers.

Anyway, #believesomewomen I guess.

Yuuuup. This is what people mean when they say politics is becoming tribal. It’s not about setting a principle - you know, don’t rape - and then enforcing that principle. The explicit practice on all sides now is just to pick groups of people you want to see win, and then shape your narrative around making sure they…

Jezebel is reporting this rape in a very different way than it usually does.

#believesomewomen amirite?

Oh, okay. I get it now. This is just the leftist racial justice advocate version of Jerry Sandusky. Nate is too useful as a figurehead for the movement, so y’all are willing to sacrifice the girl’s bodily integrity for his glory.

It’s good to know that’s how the editorial board at Jezebel thinks. The next time you say…

I am so confused. Don’t we believe all women? When did Jezebel decide that being a dude who works in movies means you should be treated differently for a rape? How on god’s green earth are you struggling with the right response to this? What, just because you agree with his politics on race his group rape of a woman…