I’m a liberal. Judging anyone by race—which you consistently do—vioaltes liberal principles, as does social justice, which is why everyone wants you illiberal racist progressive intersectional bigots and censors to fuck off to outer space so we can win elections again, you unelectable racial demagogues and puritanical…

You dropped this.

Psychology and psychiatry disagree with you, and the vast majority of humans disagree with your redefinition of racism. You are scientifically wrong, spreading a philosophy of learned helplessness, while masking your racial hatred with critical theory gobbledygook the world rightfully discards.

Nope. So you're a bigot as well as being ignorant. Not a good look. All you have to do is google something to find basic psychological concepts that totally dismantle your ideology, something that is literally taught to 4 year olds, but you are incapable of responding with anything other than racial hatred. The modern…

Great. These are concepts taught in Intro Pysch courses. At least they were until the academy’s total ideological absorption. Google it. Go ahead and google locus of control and let me know which is healthier and more productive, an external or internal locus. Tell me which you would teach to a child.

Retard fag bitch. These are words. Teaching people to be hurt by words is the most disempowering thing immaginable. It places control over ones inner life in the hands of others, something called having an external locus of control. This is a monstrous thing to teach.

Snookums, you used a strawman and are defending racial based artistic critiques while bringing race into your arguments against mine. You should join the alt right, they love identitaran flatbrains like you, you illiberal dungeon cunt.

Man Forced to Apologize for Expressing non-Maoist Opinions on Fear of Crucifixion.

I never said they they were, strawman. This writer dismissed the artist’s perspective due to race/gender/sexuality. Fuck off, bigot.

It’s racist AF to deride an artist’s perspective as hackneyed due to their race, no? Do all members of a race share the same perspective? Because that's the criticism being leveled here. I defy you to claim that isn't racist. I dare you. 

I’ve been “bitching” about how progressive judge everyone by race/gender/sexuality and openly want censorship. Why aren't you?

Uh, yeah. It is a bad idea to put people into racial collectives. It’s immoral, unethical, illiberal, and always always always leads to conflict. You racist.

Yeah, racial demagoguery is a sticking point for most people, snookums.

Uh huh. 

Yeah, this place used to be golden, but they whittled down the staff to the core believers.

Yeah, this place used to be golden, but they whittled down the staff to the core believers.

You’re a racist. I know you think sociology (sociology! Bwahaha) has successfully redefined racism so that you can be as racist as you want, but the vast majority of people disagree with and hate you. You’re just a bigot, plain an simple. Fortunately, I sense people will recommit to not judging people by immutable…

You cannot take sexuality into account and have equality of opportunity, you walking contradiction. You support both tribalism and collectivism, you tribal collectivist. I feel sorry for you. God hasn’t simply abandoned you, he fucked you over at birth.

Dude, you said sexuality should be a factor in hiring. That is not equality of opportunity. How you can claim this without having a stroke from cognitive dissonance is impressive. How you can think this is progress makes me think you have a learning disability.

Again: Why are you bringing race/gender/sexuality into this? What the fuck does your coverage have to do with his RACE? His fucking sexuality??? Why does this site break everyone down into these components numerous times a day? Oh right, you are incapable of viewing people as individuals as you are…