Correlation does not prove causation. Drug charges are based on quantity and type of drug, i.e. crack v. cocaine. I don’t see these factors right off the top. You simply cannot prove this is because of race. You cannot *prove* this is because of race, do you understand?

Poverty. And the reason they are poor is because of single parent households. And this isn’t a cultural thing in black communities. 70% of blacks are from single parent homes. 25% of whites are, and you see the same pattern: poverty, crime, drugs, cops, prison.

Blacks commit such an enormous amount of crime, it’s staggering. Are you suggesting that this level of criminality does NOT contribute to over policing and that is not a more plausible explanation than an institutional conspiracy to oppress them? And how would we stop the conspiracy?

Yeah, the first three don’t address criminal history and the seed one DOESN'T MENTION WHAT THE SMOKERS WERE DOING. This is bullshit so far.

Boil it down for me: Do these prove that people with the SAME CRIMINAR HISTORY receive different sentences BASED ON RACE?

Citation needed. These people have the same history??? Prove this if it’s such common knowledge. There was a recent study that claimed this with people with non-violent crime that got smacked down because it didn’t take into account ANY criminal history. Prove this.

Crime is the reason the communities are bad. And your solution is to stop arresting people for crime. How will that help the black community, exactly? Crazy.

I’ll repost an earlier comment:

All of this is because of black crime rates. You just accidentally said their own crime results in their communities being policed. You are saying that their crime doesn’t lead to any of this?

With what they think is a gun pointed at them?

Yeah, institutional racism doesn’t exist. The concept totally excludes the behavior of offenders. Shall I bust out the FBI crime statistics? Black people are over-policed because they commit a massive amount of crime, 7 to 10 times as much as whites.

It’s a tragic situation, but what could the cops do?

And....here come the racial ideologues. It's some non-race dependent advice.

Do not point anything resembling a gun toward the cops.

Jesus, and you say I’m missing the forest. The big five study shows personality differences based on gender. Gender and sex correlate for 99.90% of the population. Now: Do you think that these gender differences are NOT related to sex and that gender differences are totally socially constructed? And please don’t…

How far do you need me to drill down for you? I was using “sex” in a general way, which tends to include blowjobs. Who cares? You’re quibbling over irrelevant shit. It wasn’t rape (would not a forced blowjob be considered rape?), there are people pushing the idea that gender identity is totally divorced from biology…

SJWs bullied him endlessly as a misogynist/transphobe because of the blocklist containing women/trans folk. Think of that. Wheaton is a massive progressive, but he sinned against the Borg.

He was bullied off by SJWs over the blocklist. The left eat their own in an endless grinding purity death march.

I never said there is no biological basis for transgenderism and didn’t insist on a yes or no question. These activists, however, do insist that there is no biological basis whatsoever for gender identity. Do you agree with that contention?

They believe that gender identity has no basis in biology. There is overwhelming, established, mainstream evidence that personality traits such as agressiveness, consciousness, and agreeability and closely related to gender.