Yes, decided by the Supreme Court. You want to silence people over offense, meaning you're on the side of fundamentalists. 

THAT'S the legal standard, asshat. Please tell me how YOU would rule what can be said and heard, I'm sure you're pedigree is stunning.

And I didn’t realize the progressive left had ultimately concluded that freedom of speech is a threat to democracy, but thanks for just coming out and saying it. YOU do not get to decide what ideas other people are entitled to hear. Corporations should not that power. No one should. It’s not idealism to be…

You want an autistic person to leave her home be used she’s autistic and think taking her illness into account somehow means dismissing the concern for autistic who are black?

Free speech is broken? Some voices should be elevated more than others, and the marketplace of ideas is a mistake? People are irrational so their expression should be moderated less they think the wrong thing? And you and your kind know what’s best for them to think?

Yes. Any speech that does not call for imminent threat of violence is permitted.

Um. Twitter specifically said this is in support of free speech, and that's not a good reason for you, the modern left. Has it occurred to you people that you are violating bedrock liberal principles??

Turns out giving anyone the right to use my public platforms was a mistake? Orwell is breakdancing in hell.

The left has now created a full blown crisis around what can be said publicly in America, with situational and racial rules for different people of different ideologies, all while impossibly claiming to be pro-free expression and anti-bigotry. You are begging corporations to silence people with zero regard as to the…

In are you haven't noticed, the left have absolutely created a crisis around what can and cannot be publicly said. Why a liberal would think this is a good thing is fucking beyond me, but good luck cleaning up this disater, broflake.

And you and the progressive left just happen to be the arbiters of acceptable political speech, as authoritarians before you thought of themselves. Jesus Christ.

Great, your for situational corporate censorship. How progressive.

I’m a liberal. That’s why I’m mad at purported liberals bowing to hate mobs and corporate power to silence somrone. And by your logic, Sarah Jeong, James Gunn, and Can Harmon should all be silenced and fired for speech that raised mobs. Get a clue: It is not the government who decides who can speak in America, it is…

Katie, why are you pro-censorship? This breaks with decades of liberal thought. You either want to shut people up or want to let them speak. What happened? Why are taking so much joy in something that violated liberal principle?

A) I think you have a very low threshold as to what fascism is and B) you’re saying it's justified to form angry mobs depending on the target. That's where we differ, we should not how to outrage mobs and should not silence people unless they call for threats on imminent violence.

I understand you are trying to redefine what racism is so you can discriminate and be as bigoted as you want, but I reject your redefinition. 

You either want to let people speak or want to shut people up. What the fuck happened to the left??

Being against hate mobs going after people’s livelihoods—which, if you haven’t noticed, is a national past time now—and cheering on corporations kowtowing to said mobs makes me a communist? Sign me up, comrade.

You are the smegma of Eva Braun.

What, she was trolled so she replied with sustained racial hatred...for three years? If racists called you slurs, would you respond with racial hatred in turn? Would you feel moral in doing so? Sorry. No. This is what she thinks. We both know it. Are you seriously asking me to believe she likes white people???