“...logic and MRAs don’t mix..”?

I suspect Swift is in the right here but the whole thing sounds nonsensibly psychologistic if you ask me.

He had to pass the bill to see what was in it.

Don’t let it get to you.

Picture looks like maybe mid 1950s except for the ribcage ink.

Exactly. After all, women make fortunes on divorce, while they’re not looted and pillaged by family courts. They also have to prove nothing to get a lasting relationship but men have to display various accomplishments and wealth.

At least I’m not being specifically blamed for this.

But you need to be careful who might hear because they’ll tell people you’re crazy, maybe get quack pshrinks after you.

Obamacare made my insurance so expensive I had to cancel it. I do have Medicare but I also had other medical insurance. Now I only have Medicare. Not good. So don’t tell me Obamacare provided for old people.

Let them pass it, then we can see what’s in it.

Like the chlorophyll craze of the early 1950s only dangerous.

Yes, but she probably doesn’t know it.

As with the appendectomy case I’m not overall in favor of slicing people open and taking their guts out but having had appendicitis I’m sure glad it’s sometimes done.

Abortion should be limited to certain conditions and not paid for by the taxpayer. If you consider it a purely medical procedure bear in mind that an appendix is removed only when diseased (unless the doctor’s a quack or the patient’s a nut case). Abortion on demand is akin to the cases where people want their healthy…

The irresponsible, lazy people who want government to control their own behavior.

All US courts favor, even grovel to women. No surprise. Encouraging divorce and post-marriage strife vastly enriches lawyers.

Somebody knows something more about this.

All women are constantly upset about everything.

Why is vengeance wrong?

However, during that time there’s been no lessening of dual, triple, and multiple murders.