A reasonable worry.
A reasonable worry.
From a male viewpoint women have few problems about sex if any. They can always get it, never have to work for it or impress anyone to get it, and so can always refuse it.
The desire isn’t for a slave, it’s for somebody pleasant and helpful. Is having a pleasant attitude, liking someone, not constantly criticizing, nagging, and complaining being a slave?
If they can even be sentient it can probably be prevented.
I want to bring back the glyptodont. They’re recent, probably helped to become extinct by the pre-Clovis people, so DNA can probably be found.
If Obama had simply shown his birth certificate the first time the subject was brought up, and his college transcripts as well these wouldn’t be subjects. He didn’t because whether or not he has something to hide he intended to cause strife and trouble in the electorate and distract people from his plans.
That’s because the voting age should be 20 (I never understood 21), people who can’t hold down a job without owning substantial property shouldn’t be able to vote, neither should convicted criminals, and women should meet special qualifications in order to.
Interesting, assuming it’s true, but who I vote for isn’t determined by whoever actors claim they’re voting for. Indeed, that’s a good indication who not to vote for.
Good. It’s time somebody stood up to the sexual harrassment scam.
The Moon ought to be the site his first colony. It’s cheaper to get to than Mars and we could probably rescue people there. Take it slowly and methodically.
That’s why they study psychology.
As Curley of the 3 Stooges responded to “What kind of fool do you think I am?” -- “You mean there’s more than one kind?”
Consciousness and intelligence developed to alter behavior according to experience and surroundings. Of course psychological tests aren’t consistent. What they really show are behaviors that are inconsistent, which the experimenters aren’t looking for. Besides, behaviors that don’t affect the outcome of a situation…
What has such therapy accomplished but make neurotic people even more pathologically self-absorbed and self-conscious while giving psychopaths practice in convincing “experts” they’ve changed?
They actually censored a black person? A black FEMALE?
Maybe he was ambushed because someone heard him singing.
Totally cashless societies should be illegal. Like driverless cars they are schemes for the government to minutely control everyone’s lives and create new crimes like barter.
That’s right. The audience gets too caught up in the action to notice. I seem to remember mentioning the functional weapons in the original Westworld and people responded as though I’d doused them with icewater.
My idea is that most women are competent adults who are able to work the system for the colossal benefits and privileges they have. There’s nothing misogynistic about that.
I never understood why the robots in the original had access to real weapons.