OH, FOR...

No, not — it's DIFFERENT. ENTIRELY DIFFERENT.

Right? Christian evangelicals have more in common with radical Muslims than they'd like to admit.

Her husband needs horse blinders and a lead.

Good call. Burkas are the way to go, since men simply can't be controlled.

Is there any rapist out there who is all "Yeah, she didn't want it but I went ahead and did it anyway?" EVERY FUCKING RAPIST SAYS THE PERSON THEY RAPED WANTED IT.

Watch out nausea is apparently a big turn on for this guy.

"It was all mutual. We were in the groove."

As I read I couldn't decide if the kid or the mom pissed me off more. Then I got to this;

literally brought tears to me and my wife's eyes as we read it. And the way his mom is so out if touch in denial. Sick.

Speaking of vomiting... Are we really supposed to believe that this kid saw Rehtaeh vomiting out a window and believed her to be capable of consenting to sex? What? Who would think "I know she just threw up from alcohol, but she's not stopping me so she must be into it?"

"Name me a teenager who didn't make mistakes."

Just the fact that he would say that speaks to something lacking in his brain, you know? She threw up out a fucking window and this kid is trying to say they were in the groove? What the fuck is a groove to him? It's sooo belittling and dismissive and just fucking gross. So gross.

There are more important points to be discussed, certainly, but I would like to note that Christie Blatchford is basically Canada's Ann Coulter. Please don't anyone think her narrative is representative of how Canada feels about the multitude of crimes committed against Rehtaeh Parsons.

"I will not live with the guilt of someone passing away, but I will live with the guilt of sending the picture."

Nothing this fuckstick or his parents say will ever matter, because the one person who matters in this scenario can't speak for herself ever again.

UMMMM UNDER THE CRIMINAL CODE, HAVING SEX WITH SOMEONE WHO IS IMPAIRED IS FUCKING RAPE.

How do you admit that you distributed the picture, but think that wasn't bullying and would have no effect on her? The cognitive dissonance there astounds me. And of course the interviewer is all too happy to promote it.

"Police say they don't have enough evidence to charge. They also waited ten months to investigate."

"We were in the groove." I want to vomit.