If someone was like “I’ll buy you a car worth half a mil,” I wouldn’t be like “Oh no, a Ford Focus is just fine for me!” Be fucking greedy! These dumbass men are willing to throw piles of money at beautiful women for the pleasure of their company? Take them for all they are worth. You aren’t going to be young…
mocena
mocena
What, like potatoes?
Bless your heart.
Alright, I was wrong about the pink tax thing. However, the fact is that women are absolutely more harassed on public transportation than men, that’s not subjective. So yeah, it’s definitely more dangerous for women than for men, which is why women choose to take alternate forms of transportation.
They choose this because it isn’t safe to travel the way men travel. No one called it a pink tax.
It really doesn’t. First of all, there are the high number of single mothers included in the statistic. Second, many childless women are not married and do not share a budget with a man. There’s no lack of meaning here. Even if you were right and these costs would be shared among a family budget, it doesn’t change…
Primary caregiver does not mean “doesn’t work.”
Highly unlikely? 23% of mothers are single mothers. Single mothers are both sole breadwinners and primary caregivers. You’re bad at this.
While I agree with you that the blame is misplaced, I do not think that the OP meant that.
Because not all women exist in families with two earners and one budget.
Cardi B didn’t know the first thing about birth, apparently, and she was the one doing it. I’m always surprised that people are surprised by easily googleable facts. Like, when I’m about to go to a new grocery store, I google it first. I can’t imagine not doing the same when I’m about to have a BABY.
I read Dear Prudence over on Slate, and a couple of years ago I was in a museum in Toronto and brushed past PRUDENCE (the one from before, not the current one.) I didn’t say anything but was kind of impressed/ashamed that I instantly recognized her from her photo on Slate.
Perhaps! I’m just a little concerned that so many people think that his “confession” is enough to convict him and I don’t think that it’s that much of a stretch that an already unbalanced someone could say untrue words like that to himself under a crazy amount of stress.
So it wasn’t really the WolfPAC resolution that did it, it was the state-based one?
Counterpoint! Sometimes people with crazy high anxiety exhibit Tourette’s style symptoms where they say things that are shocking and untrue. If I was his lawyer, I’d introduce that shit ASAP.
Those two issues are completely unrelated. The WP resolution is to call for a national convention to amend the federal constitution. The second thing you are talking about is Rhode Island voting against having a STATE constitutional convention, which has nothing to do with the US Constitution.
I’m a little confused. The resolution was passed, and then afterwards, you were threatened? With what, exactly? Since the resolution was already passed, what would be the point of threatening you?
Someone threatened you because you worked on campaign finance reform?
Unless you already are, you should hook up with WolfPAC.