I hear you. But fortunately, this year was really only nine months.

Totally agree with this logic personally. I think, though, that Porsche Turbos are exactly for people who have lots of money and just want a car that’s fast and liveable. They also get purchased a lot by Ferrari owners who want something they can use every day.

Kind of like Z06 better.

The mongols did way more with way less than Hitler did.

Was looking for this one. Star for you.

Genuine question, since you might know the answer:

This is especially true in California, where we generally can’t get better than 91 octane gas.

Perfect use of that video, which is still amazing to this day.

The word was it was comfortable for people up to 6’2”, which is pretty reasonable. 6’5” is a lot to accommodate in a car like this.

I’m not sure. He might have run the full course. I think the Trophy Truck people are more likely to do that than the smaller vehicles and the bikes. It’s really a crazy thing, as it involves driving 20+ hours at full tilt.

Very few people do it all. I think Ironman Stewart was one of the first, which is one of the reasons he earned the name.

Regarding Drive - evil henchmen almost always manage to keep up with impressive hero cars, despite driving far inferior vehicles. Based on this, it seems like henchman are some of the best drivers around.

I realize the hypercars are impressive and all, but I’ll bet this car is at least as much fun to drive on track.

That’s the wrong Mercedes comparison. For ultimate depreciation, AMGs are the way to go.

One word: Lease.

The new Mustang 5.0 with performance pack.

Have you looked at the Mustang lately? Most of that intake is fake.

Assuring that the current ugly ass SL will have even worse depreciation than usual...

Exactly. I see Subarus way overrepresented at the end of long dirt roads.

But can it beat a Viper ACR around a track? ;)