mntest347
mn_test347
mntest347

From viewing the videos, “it’s very clear it would have been difficult to avoid this collision in any kind of mode (autonomous or human-driven) based on how she came from the shadows right into the roadway,” [Tempe Police Chief] Moir said.

Because it doesn’t fall asleep, it doesn’t drive drunk, it doesn’t text, drive the wrong-way on a one-way, it doesn’t speed (much) and it can detect a object 360-degrees over 200 times per second.

The point is that self-driving technology has to be better than a human.

Some of us know :

-

“this shows that Uber’s handling of autonomy has been reckless”

“Didn’t you notice that you had one of the nuts left over?”

Not to mention - the battery will be (mostly) recharged after the trip back down.

“According to the local ABC television affiliate, the self-driving vehicle was in autonomous mode and there was an operator behind the wheel when it struck a woman walking outside of a crosswalk early Monday morning.”

“Shouldn’t testing be done in a far more isolated environment? You know, like where innocent people won’t be in jeopardy of being killed.”

Funny it doesn’t mention the main trick to make closer people look taller - used by both Zuckerberg and in this article - to shoot with the camera at waist-height.

It’s 19.5% loss.

It takes only 300 $15k cars along with each $4M hyper car to bring the average down below $30k. And only 7 $15k cars along with each $100k car.

Fancy Kristen always gets a driver with her cars.

At least they are not changing their prediction.

Sorry. Misread your post.

Mazda 6 is not exactly a Civic R.

I was wondering why it is cheaper. And what they plan on doing with the 2017.5 Grand Tourings that were already selling for $7k below msrp.