We’re for state’s rights, except when we’re against them.
We’re for state’s rights, except when we’re against them.
“a certain amount of water needs to be available to the animal in an open container, which means that its promptly spilled”
Careful in states/provinces that start and end with the letter ‘O’.
“many planes don’t have climate controlled or pressurized cargo holds”
Bear with me for a few moments. The thread started out with Trevor saying he had been stopped for being black. And I think everyone knows what that means and does not disagree. But then he went on to give a list of police-reasons - that are the same reasons that everyone has been stopped for. And then went on to say…
It’s kind of like cherry-picking the race issue, when gender inequality is a much greater issue. I’m not using it against you - in no way does it contradict racial profiling.
“What’s The Most Bullshit Reason You’ve Gotten Pulled Over For?” if I didn’t mention the elephant in the room someone else would have.
Seems to indicate there is racial profiling. Isn’t that what I said?
“How/Where does gender apply to a conversation of racial disparity”
“So again, to pretend as if race *isn’t* a factor in who gets pulled over is absolutely asinine and ignorant.”
“There was zero reason to comment”
Although there are racial disparities in that study - what stands out most is that men are twice as likely to be searched as women. The likelihood of being stopped by race - 10% vs 13% - pales in comparison.
From the study - it looks like men are the ones being profiled the most.
“Are your boobs large and generally uncovered?”
“the 356 HP rear-wheel drive”
“more regular people are buying Teslas.”
The guy’s name is Xander Fuckwit. I don’t see what the big deal is.
Don’t sweat it. I thought I was reading the comments for Morning Shift, but somehow scrolled into the next story.
When your engine quits when you are turning left in front of a semi traveling 85 mph. And any number of other similar situations.