He should have asked a different wife.

Most of us don’t have enough experience with this situation to apply Occam’s razor.

It would be amusing. Since they most likely speak english.

“Tip: Make sure the French you are speaking is actual Parisian French. I experienced poor customer service while there anytime I broke out my French, and come to find out, it was because I was speaking Canadian French.”

“Actually commercial insurance costs (on average) less.. because the assumption is you will be doing less “foolish things” with a business vehicle”

in Portland, where there are no self-serve gas stations

Cooks and bloggers also have car insurance, maintenance, and depreciation.

“then they would already be having expenses of auto insurance, fuel and repairs”

The hardest course I took for my MBA was calculating the cost of Overhead.

Power per liter of displacement doesn’t mean much. Look at pushrod (OHV) V8s. Small and compact V8s, good power, but large displacement.

I was thinking that a 200hp engine in a Miata would give it a better power-to-weight ratio than a 181hp engine. Glad you cleared that up.

I was thinking the cladding looked ugly until I saw this. Slab-sided comes to mind.

“you dont seem to understand power to weight ratios.”

That’s a sound economic analysis of the proposed tarrifs.

“I am enjoying the extra $400/mo”

It seems like you own an FRS or BRZ.

Aside from the CX9, when was the last time Mazda had any engine that produced as much power as the FRS?

They’ve had 5 years to give it more power.

....and a roof and a rear seat. I thought we settled that.

WTF is wrong with Mazda that they can’t get 100hp/l? The FRS/BRZ has been around for five years.

The Subaru 2.0 is still 10% more powerful. Doing what Mazda won’t. Or can’t.